• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Process costing

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Process costing

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 22, 2022 at 10:48 am #663911
    Sukuna
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    the following information relates to a company polishing process for the previous period
    output to finished goods 5408 units valued at $29744
    normal loss 276 units
    actual loss 112 units

    all losses have a scrap value of $2.50 per unit and there was no opening or closing work in progress

    the value of the input during the period was?

    I have a question about the calculation of a unit of output is $29,744/5,408 = $5.50

    As we know we should divide the cost by the expected output… We should assume that this given number of units (5408) is the expected output right? I am a little bit confused here…

    August 22, 2022 at 10:57 am #663916
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The expected output is not 5,408. There is a normal loss of 276 units and therefore they were expecting the output to be higher.

    August 23, 2022 at 8:47 am #664004
    Sukuna
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    How do you know that they were expecting higher output?

    Why they don’t divided on expected output instead of actual output?

    August 23, 2022 at 11:40 am #664033
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Sorry, ignore my previous answer.

    The question says that the actual output was 5,408. It also says that these units have ben valued at $29,744.

    Therefore they must have been valuing each unit at 29,744/5,408 = $5.50

    How they calculated a value of $5.50 per unit is not relevant.

    August 24, 2022 at 8:14 am #664132
    Sukuna
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    thanks <3

    August 25, 2022 at 8:43 am #664214
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘Process costing’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Breadtoast67 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • adatya on Auditors’ Rights, Appointment, Removal, Resignation and Regulation – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • John Moffat on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • RuthlynE on FM Chapter 11 Questions – Sources of finance – equity
  • AllisonHoang on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in