• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Process costing

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Process costing

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 22, 2022 at 10:48 am #663911
    Sukuna
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    the following information relates to a company polishing process for the previous period
    output to finished goods 5408 units valued at $29744
    normal loss 276 units
    actual loss 112 units

    all losses have a scrap value of $2.50 per unit and there was no opening or closing work in progress

    the value of the input during the period was?

    I have a question about the calculation of a unit of output is $29,744/5,408 = $5.50

    As we know we should divide the cost by the expected output… We should assume that this given number of units (5408) is the expected output right? I am a little bit confused here…

    August 22, 2022 at 10:57 am #663916
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The expected output is not 5,408. There is a normal loss of 276 units and therefore they were expecting the output to be higher.

    August 23, 2022 at 8:47 am #664004
    Sukuna
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    How do you know that they were expecting higher output?

    Why they don’t divided on expected output instead of actual output?

    August 23, 2022 at 11:40 am #664033
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Sorry, ignore my previous answer.

    The question says that the actual output was 5,408. It also says that these units have ben valued at $29,744.

    Therefore they must have been valuing each unit at 29,744/5,408 = $5.50

    How they calculated a value of $5.50 per unit is not relevant.

    August 24, 2022 at 8:14 am #664132
    Sukuna
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    thanks <3

    August 25, 2022 at 8:43 am #664214
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘Process costing’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global
  • Kakui on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in