• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Planning with limiting factors

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Planning with limiting factors

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 29, 2021 at 9:54 pm #633444
    deekshabee
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Hello,

    Following is question 100 from the Kaplan exam kit.

    Q plc makes two products – Quone and Qutwo – from the same raw material. The selling
    price and cost details of these products are as shown below:

    Quone Qutwo

    Selling price $ 20.00 $18.00
    ––––– –––––
    Direct material ($2.00 per kg) 6.00 5.00
    Direct labour 4.00 3.00
    Variable overhead 2.00 1.50
    ––––– –––––
    12.00 9.50
    ––––– –––––
    Contribution per unit 8.00 8.50
    The maximum demand for these products is 500 units per week for Quone, and an unlimited number of units per week for Qutwo.
    What is the shadow price of these materials, if the material were limited to 2,000 kgs per
    week? Pick from list
    List options are:
    • $nil
    • $2.00 per kg
    • $2.66 per kg
    • $3.40 per kg

    Sir, can you please help me understand what the question is asking here and how to solve it?
    I saw the answer in the book but I didn’t quite get it.

    August 30, 2021 at 8:01 am #633467
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Given that there is only one limited resource in that materials are limited to 2,000 kg, you use standard key factor analysis (contribution per kg of material) to rank so as to decide which of the two products is best. You will then make 500 of the best one (because that is the most that can be sold) and use the rest of the 2,000 kg on the other one.

    Obviously if more kg were available you would then make more of the second best unit, and the shadow cost, as per the standard definition, is the most extra that you would be prepared to pay for one extra kg of material, which is equal to the contribution per kg generated from the second best product (which you would already have calculated in the first step of this).

    August 31, 2021 at 12:23 am #633576
    deekshabee
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    okay, so you’re saying that contribution would be 2.67 (8/3) for A and 3.4 (8.5/2.5) for B.
    So, product B is the best.

    and shadow price would also be 3.4. that is fine.

    but I don’t quite understand what do you mean by “You will then make 500 of the best one (because that is the most that can be sold) and use the rest of the 2,000 kg on the other one.

    Why would we make only 500 units of the best one (i.e. Qutwo)? I mean it has an unlimited demand.

    August 31, 2021 at 8:33 am #633608
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Sorry, the answer should be 3.40.

    I was reading too fast and thinking that demand was limited to 500 for each of the two products (in which case what I wrote would have been correct).

    However, as you have written, since the demand for Qutwo is unlimited it would be more Qutwo that would be made which would make the shadow price equal to 3.40 per kg.

    September 1, 2021 at 8:16 pm #633874
    deekshabee
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Yes,
    I understand.

    Thank you 🙂

    September 2, 2021 at 7:23 am #633911
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘Planning with limiting factors’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • John Moffat on The financial management environment – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in