• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

plannig and operational variance

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › plannig and operational variance

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 21, 2013 at 3:26 pm #133063
    bik123
    Member
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 81
    • ☆☆

    I don’ t understand the answer to the following question(it is answer from study text), so my question is:
    Why the chcange in market share don’t influence our computation, How I shoud treat this change?
    with which variance market share change is connected?

    PG budgeted sales for 20X8 were 5,000 units. The standard contribution is $9.60 per unit. A recession in
    20X8 meant that the market for PG’s products declined by 5%. PG’s market share also fell by 3%. Actual
    sales were 4,500 units

    Required
    Calculate planning and operational variances for sales volume.

    Planning variance
    Units
    Original budgeted sales 5,000
    Revised budget sales (–5%) 4,750
    250 A
    @ Contribution per unit of $9.60 $2,400

    Operational variance
    Units
    Revised budget sales 4,750
    Actual sales 4,500
    250 A
    @ Contribution per unit of $9.60 $2,400

    thank you for reply.

    June 21, 2013 at 4:00 pm #133065
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54711
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If the market share had stayed the same, then the sales would have fallen by 5% to 4750.

    However the actual sales we are told are 4500 – the fact that they are less than 4750 must be because of the fall in market share.

    So…..the fall in market share has not been ignored. It is simply that we do not need the 3% because we are told what the actual sales are.

    June 22, 2013 at 10:10 am #133082
    bik123
    Member
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 81
    • ☆☆

    thank you for reply

    June 25, 2013 at 8:29 am #133158
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54711
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • crabtreef on PM Chapter 9 Questions Short-term decision making
  • Abdjr11 on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 6 Questions Depreciation
  • Masterodad on FA Chapter 6 Questions Depreciation
  • natashad25 on MA Chapter 3 Questions Presenting Information

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in