- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by
Ken Garrett.
Ken Garrett.-
Posts
-
Anuja Nair
- Topics: 365
- Replies: 353
- ☆☆☆☆
Hi sir, for the following questions below, how do we differentiate whether the matter is pervasive ?
Question)
Company A
Profit before tax $ 10 000
Total assets $2300 000
Overstatement of receivables due to an irrecoverable debt not being written off $15 000Company B
Profit before tax $ 245 000
Total assets $6500 000
Overstatement of inventory due to failure to value at lower of cost & NRV $85 000In the answer key, it states that for company A the matter is MATERIAL AND PERVASIVE. But for company B the matter is MATERIAL BUT NOT PERVASIVE.
I understand why it’s material. But I don’t understand why for company A its pervasive but for company B, its not pervasive. Could you explain?
Ken Garrett
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 10132
- ☆☆☆☆☆
The argument would be that changing a profit of 10 into a loss of 5 is a very serious misstatement – so serious that it is pervasive.
I could argue the other way: the misstatement is 15, the assets are 2,300 so whether there is a profit of 10 or a loss of 5 isn’t really important enough to be pervasive.
There is no definite rule about when material turns into material and pervasive.
Anuja Nair
Ken Garrett- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.