Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA APM Exams › Performance management v measurement
- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by mathonestler.
- AuthorPosts
- June 1, 2015 at 5:05 pm #251424
Hi, please can you explain this in a bit of detail?
Measurement I think is Roi, Ri (for financial) balanced scorecard, prism ( for non financial)
Management I think is the comparison of what we have measured to the mission statementAm I right or completing wrong,
Please help?June 1, 2015 at 5:57 pm #251537Measurement is fine and will include both financial and nonfinancial performance measures.
Management implies judging whether performance is good enough and making appropriate adjustments. Mission gives very high level indications of what is meant by good performance. In practice, objectives (SMART) would probably be used to judge performance.
June 1, 2015 at 6:01 pm #251540So in management this is comparing to the objectives? Correct?
June 2, 2015 at 7:22 am #251764Yes. Objectives are definite targets that are set and if the organisation doesn’t hit them, management is needed.
February 10, 2016 at 1:10 am #299879Hi,
I also have a problem with these two terms.
A typical exam question will say something like “what are the performance management implications of changing to a JIT system”.
Are there specific issues that can be itemised when dealing with performance management?
Thanks
February 10, 2016 at 8:16 am #299896There are not really any general issues – they depend on the circumstances. So if the company is moving to JiT the big risk will be that the system does not run smoothly and that the company runs out of components or can’t fulfill a customer order quickly enough.
Good performance is defined by what the organisation wants to do and often the balanced scorecard approach is useful for generating ideas.
Financial perspective: profits etc (there can be performance measures based on damaged stock, cost/unit, penalties for late delivery to customers)
Customer perspective: are we delivering goods of the right quality and quantity to the right place at the right time (or has JIT messed that up)?
Internal business perspective: lots of metrics about receiving goods on time, making goods efficiently, quality problems, perhaps making sure that there are always several suppliers fr each component to provide back-up).
Innovation and learning: metrics that measure the improvement in performance, or perhaps reduction in construction time, or better logistics.
February 10, 2016 at 9:38 am #299915Thank you, this helps a lot
March 1, 2016 at 7:59 am #302464Hi Gromit,
I was wondering if my reason regarding performance measurement vs management is correct to apply the terms in the scenario. Using building blocks model, dimensions are measurements and applying to the scenario you need to discuss the problems (or benefits) of being able to measure performance of employees for example (e.g. technical problems or structural problems)
Performance management is the whole system of the building block model from measuring the performance to setting targets of good performance to rewarding the good performance to achieve defined goals and objectives. Therefore, if you do not have identified objectives (CSF) then you cannot identify the KPIs and set targets which leads to rewards. Applying to the scenario, you need to discuss which part of the system is broken.
Am I missing anything that would relates to performance measurement vs management?Thank you
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.