• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

performance analysis

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › performance analysis

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 9, 2017 at 5:23 pm #371786
    eiman
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Profitability
    At first sight it appears that Victular would see a much greater return on its investment if it acquired Merlot
    rather than Grappa. A closer analysis of the figures suggests that this may not be the case.
    Merlot has an ROCE over 40% higher than Grappa’s and an ROE more than double Grappa’s ROE. However,
    the difference is due more to the lower level of equity in Merlot than to the superiority of its profit. Merlot’s
    equity (2,800) is only half that of Grappa (5,500). This reduces the denominator for ROCE and doubles the
    ROE.

    Merlot ROCE = 1,990 / (2,800 +6,700) = 20.9%
    Grappa ROCE = 1,260 / (5,500 + 3,000 ) = 14.8%
    Difference of S.H.E = 5,500(Grappa) – 2,800 (Merlot)= 2,700, (almost double of Merlot)
    but total difference in capital employed which is S.H.E + non-current liabilities= 1,000 only.
    Merlot capital employed = (2,800 + 6,700) = 9,500
    Grappa capital employed = (5,500 + 3,000) = 8,500
    so the increase in S.H.E in Grappa is not the main cause for its ROCE to decline, because the increase in S.H.E is balanced with the decrease in long term liabilities, so total denominator of Grappa is not higher than Merlot’s.,

    February 9, 2017 at 5:27 pm #371789
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    What do you want me to do with this?

    February 9, 2017 at 5:37 pm #371790
    eiman
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Mike! Why in the answer they mention the difference is due to s.h.e increase !! Why they didnt mention it is due to long term liabilities decrease !

    February 9, 2017 at 6:20 pm #371793
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Well, I suppose it’s a combination of the two.

    Where there IS a difference is in ROE where Merlot comes in at 71% compared with just 23% for Grappa but I don’t understand the logic of the printed solution

    Sorry

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Kim Smith on AA Chapter 9 Questions
  • Walkera on Basic Variance Analysis part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • kartierclass on AA Chapter 9 Questions
  • revathik on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Josfel on Relevant cash flows for DCF Taxation (example 4) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in