- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Hallo Sir,
I would ask you some things about P3 Sept 2016 exam which I am wondering.
First of all, about SAF – does the examiner give a mark about explanation of what is suitability/ acceptability? I wrote about one stakeholder under suitability heading not acceptability but write about the attitude to the stakeholder ( I mean people in the country) but not mentioned that it is stakeholder. Do you think the examiner will give me a mark for that?
Second, does the examiner give marks about rxplanation what is meant under headings of contextual framework – time, preservation, scope, power, readiness?
About professional headings – what is the chance to receive 2 marks for clear and logical flow if you write your argument under headings?
The last one – I wrote incorrectly about Q1 d about aquisition not about partnership but I think some of tha arguments are valid for partnership. Will the examiner give me marks about the valid points nevermind I write about acquisition?
Many thanks in advance!!!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.