• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Parker 6/13

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AAA Advanced Audit and Assurance Forums › Parker 6/13

  • This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 27, 2018 at 2:17 pm #454264
    rachna09
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hi I’m currently trying to attempt part A of Parker 6/13 paper which is asking to perform preliminary analytical procedures and to evaluate the audit risks.

    I’m confused as to how I start this question? And what I calculations I should do? Is there a format which we should always follow when attempting a number heavy question?
    I started by calculating the percentage change for revenue, COS and then worked out the receivable days payable days and inventory days.

    May 29, 2018 at 10:38 am #454591
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 138
    • Replies: 8439
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is where planning an answer is particularly useful – and remember than 15 minutes isn’t all the time you should expect to spend in reading in planning.
    I think you “start” such a Q by making annotations on the Q paper – this could include, for example, simply putting up/down arrows against each of the actual amounts – so revenue up – but when you read note 1 – cost of sales is down. (Note 1 effectively tells you that you need to exclude the $250k from cos in calculating GP%.)

    There’s no reason why, in the exam, you can’t present your appendix before the briefing note – clearly label it as such.

    Part of deciding what/how much you need to do is reflecting on the marks available – 24 includes “identify and explain any additional information” – so let’s say that’s 4 marks – you’re looking for 20 marks of evaluating audit risks (which is the purpose of analytical procedures at the planning stage). So let’s say 2 marks per evaluated risk – you’re looking for max 10 areas of risk. I would guess that only 1/4 of the marks would be available for the calculations – so don’t calculate every ratio just because you can – it’s more important that you can comment on what you calculate.

    September 24, 2020 at 12:43 pm #586547
    rez92
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    I had a question in relation to the division of marks for this question:

    6 marks is calculation for ratio (1/2 marks for trend)
    5 marks for additional information
    So 13 Marks for Audit Risks and explanation of Preliminary Analytical Review. is this accurate?

    Also, the answer states a lot of ratios which I know I wont have to do them all. But if I want to select the ratios to perform, how many should I stick with for example in liquidity (as it involves current ration, inventory holding days, receivables collection period and payables payment period)

    What are the 6 ratios I can stick to in order to not spend too much time here since I cannot finish the answer in time?

    September 24, 2020 at 2:11 pm #586554
    rez92
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Also when explaining the results of analytical review, will 2 marks be awarded per explanation (Inventory days – 2, Receivables collection period – 2)?

    September 24, 2020 at 2:55 pm #586557
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 138
    • Replies: 8439
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    As per original published marking scheme:
    “Up to 2 marks for each audit risk/area from preliminary analytical review evaluated ….

    the scheme then lists 12 topics which would make up maximum 24 marks

    then, of this ….

    1 mark for each ratio and comparative calculated (½ mark for a trend) to a maximum of 6 marks
    1 mark for each additional information request to a maximum of 5 marks”

    So yes 13 would be the indicative number of marks – IF full 6 marks were awarded for ratios and 5 marks for additional information – but the marker could award marks for risk areas with only 3 ratios (say) and 3 information requests (say) – and the candidate could still, theoretically, be awarded full marks.

    What the marking guide is telling you is that you should expect the easier marks to be capped – so don’t just list dozens of calculations which are not then used in the briefing note.

    Which ratios to choose will depend on the information given in each scenario – but you should be looking for a range – say at least one profitability/liquidity and solvency – but then which others to choose should depend on whether it highlights any additional risk.

    I recommend you read the current examiner’s report from the AAA September 2018 exam for further guidance.

    September 24, 2020 at 2:58 pm #586558
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 138
    • Replies: 8439
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Re your also – if you look at the list of matters (2 marks available for each) in the marking scheme it should be clear that you would NOT get 2 marks for explanation of inventory days AND 2 marks for receivables days – because only 2 marks were available in total for liquidity:
    – Profitability
    – Liquidity
    – Solvency
    – Going concern
    – Provisions
    – Finance costs
    – Tax expense
    – Development costs
    – Property revaluation
    – Overtime payments control risk
    – New client detection risk
    – Opening balances

    If you want a tutor response to future posts please use the ask the tutor forum.

    September 24, 2020 at 3:06 pm #586560
    rez92
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thank you so much! It is clear now and I will use “Ask the tutor forum” moving forward!

    September 24, 2020 at 5:06 pm #586567
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 138
    • Replies: 8439
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are most welcome Rezwana!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The topic ‘Parker 6/13’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • vesuvianthree0 on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • amanization on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Sid24012003 on Government grants – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in