• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Parker 6/13

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AAA Advanced Audit and Assurance Forums › Parker 6/13

  • This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 27, 2018 at 2:17 pm #454264
    rachna09
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hi I’m currently trying to attempt part A of Parker 6/13 paper which is asking to perform preliminary analytical procedures and to evaluate the audit risks.

    I’m confused as to how I start this question? And what I calculations I should do? Is there a format which we should always follow when attempting a number heavy question?
    I started by calculating the percentage change for revenue, COS and then worked out the receivable days payable days and inventory days.

    May 29, 2018 at 10:38 am #454591
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8276
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is where planning an answer is particularly useful – and remember than 15 minutes isn’t all the time you should expect to spend in reading in planning.
    I think you “start” such a Q by making annotations on the Q paper – this could include, for example, simply putting up/down arrows against each of the actual amounts – so revenue up – but when you read note 1 – cost of sales is down. (Note 1 effectively tells you that you need to exclude the $250k from cos in calculating GP%.)

    There’s no reason why, in the exam, you can’t present your appendix before the briefing note – clearly label it as such.

    Part of deciding what/how much you need to do is reflecting on the marks available – 24 includes “identify and explain any additional information” – so let’s say that’s 4 marks – you’re looking for 20 marks of evaluating audit risks (which is the purpose of analytical procedures at the planning stage). So let’s say 2 marks per evaluated risk – you’re looking for max 10 areas of risk. I would guess that only 1/4 of the marks would be available for the calculations – so don’t calculate every ratio just because you can – it’s more important that you can comment on what you calculate.

    September 24, 2020 at 12:43 pm #586547
    rez92
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    I had a question in relation to the division of marks for this question:

    6 marks is calculation for ratio (1/2 marks for trend)
    5 marks for additional information
    So 13 Marks for Audit Risks and explanation of Preliminary Analytical Review. is this accurate?

    Also, the answer states a lot of ratios which I know I wont have to do them all. But if I want to select the ratios to perform, how many should I stick with for example in liquidity (as it involves current ration, inventory holding days, receivables collection period and payables payment period)

    What are the 6 ratios I can stick to in order to not spend too much time here since I cannot finish the answer in time?

    September 24, 2020 at 2:11 pm #586554
    rez92
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Also when explaining the results of analytical review, will 2 marks be awarded per explanation (Inventory days – 2, Receivables collection period – 2)?

    September 24, 2020 at 2:55 pm #586557
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8276
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    As per original published marking scheme:
    “Up to 2 marks for each audit risk/area from preliminary analytical review evaluated ….

    the scheme then lists 12 topics which would make up maximum 24 marks

    then, of this ….

    1 mark for each ratio and comparative calculated (½ mark for a trend) to a maximum of 6 marks
    1 mark for each additional information request to a maximum of 5 marks”

    So yes 13 would be the indicative number of marks – IF full 6 marks were awarded for ratios and 5 marks for additional information – but the marker could award marks for risk areas with only 3 ratios (say) and 3 information requests (say) – and the candidate could still, theoretically, be awarded full marks.

    What the marking guide is telling you is that you should expect the easier marks to be capped – so don’t just list dozens of calculations which are not then used in the briefing note.

    Which ratios to choose will depend on the information given in each scenario – but you should be looking for a range – say at least one profitability/liquidity and solvency – but then which others to choose should depend on whether it highlights any additional risk.

    I recommend you read the current examiner’s report from the AAA September 2018 exam for further guidance.

    September 24, 2020 at 2:58 pm #586558
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8276
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Re your also – if you look at the list of matters (2 marks available for each) in the marking scheme it should be clear that you would NOT get 2 marks for explanation of inventory days AND 2 marks for receivables days – because only 2 marks were available in total for liquidity:
    – Profitability
    – Liquidity
    – Solvency
    – Going concern
    – Provisions
    – Finance costs
    – Tax expense
    – Development costs
    – Property revaluation
    – Overtime payments control risk
    – New client detection risk
    – Opening balances

    If you want a tutor response to future posts please use the ask the tutor forum.

    September 24, 2020 at 3:06 pm #586560
    rez92
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thank you so much! It is clear now and I will use “Ask the tutor forum” moving forward!

    September 24, 2020 at 5:06 pm #586567
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8276
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are most welcome Rezwana!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The topic ‘Parker 6/13’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • JocelynChen on The valuation of mergers and acquisitions (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Rajpoot on ACCA BT Chapter 4 – Organisational culture – Questions
  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 6 Questions Depreciation
  • MZahidrafique on ACCA F2 Key to success
  • ACCA2025@ on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in