- This topic has 87 replies, 65 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
.
- Posts
i have a question regarding Q2:
not all of these part questions have been IFRS2 share based payments, or have they? opinions seem to differ a lot about that. some say that the two mini scenarios without employees (part a hedging, and part c? where they bought the machine) are not under IFRS2. Any ideas?- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
the paper was definately better than the June one. I found the cash flow rather daunting because of the complicated notes. Q2 & Q3 were so so.anyway,hope i managed a 50.
- Topics: 6
- Replies: 15
- ☆
All questions are o.k. .
The paper was fair. Cashflow statements had a difficult adjustments as expected. Hope i got a pass.
The paper was ok even though the complication itself specially the cash flow, when I’ve seen cash flow I was very excited, however, when i turned back the page the notes were bit complicated. Q2 was not sure so jumped to Q3 (part c was difficult) then i did not have any other option but to go to Q4 SME was not prepared for it but thought just to give a try on, part a then part B was ok
many thanks to open tuition which i would recommend to any one in particular for this paper it has every thing that you need even though if you have to pay for it is worthy than attending BPP or Caplan or what ever places.. Inever attended any classes, only used Open tuition and i hope did well on the exam even though some points haven’t been very clear,
I wish every bodit the best of luck on Feb.
Well i just thot for a while what the students have dOne if Graham gave foreign, piece meal acq and complex structure(in detail) anyhow cashflow question 1 was easy compared to the trendz….
I left IAS-39 whole and just read ias-32 fortunately was saved…
Question 2 was tricky…but somehow managed to justify MY VIEW POINT….dont know what was the right answer…
Paper was fine as compared to past trendz….but am not hopeful that much…
Main thing is presence of mind and i am lacking- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
it was my 1st attempt, and an good p2 experience…..
hopefully……just pass expected- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
in manair…although 19.1 % holding but its advisory team had their influence over the 60% decission…i believe it should be considered as a subsidiary……..
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
i got a difference of 23.5 which i stated as a “computational error” in notes
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
@Aimalacca: Manair a subsidiary? That reaquires control, not influence. Sure you don’t mean associate?
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 9
- ☆
cashflow is much easier than the consolidated balance sheet for me,however still made some mistake.this is the second time i attempted it , really a disaster the first time, even made a big mistake about the group strusture.really hope i could pass it .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.