Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › Paper F7 Dec 2010 exam was
- This topic has 144 replies, 90 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- December 14, 2010 at 7:44 pm #75022AnonymousInactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
does anyone know, the second part of the fourth question on inventory valuation? was it a loss of 0.6 millions and not a profit of 2 million as per the assistant accountant….plzzzz respond
December 14, 2010 at 9:14 pm #75023AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 6
- β
Again another exam where timing was an issue for me. The exam had me – I feel very worn from this one. I am hoping for a pass I will be totally devastated if I fail.
December 14, 2010 at 9:47 pm #75026AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- β
@derrickagyiri said:
i made a huge mistake … i apportioned the month for the consolidation wronglyPre inquisition is said 4 month and post acquisition i said 8 month
how bad have i fuck up mates .. someone tell me π
December 14, 2010 at 10:05 pm #75028AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- β
overall, i think the questions were fair…as with the rest,i was also suffering from the timing issue…actually all the questions were bits and pieces from the the Kaplan/BPP exam kits,especially for Q2…btw, what is the PURP for Q1?
December 14, 2010 at 10:16 pm #75029@norhayati66 said:
overall, i think the questions were fair…as with the rest,i was also suffering from the timing issue…actually all the questions were bits and pieces from the the Kaplan/BPP exam kits,especially for Q2…btw, what is the PURP for Q1?it was 400 of mine 320 for G.R and 40 for NCI
400 came through 2000 *25/125 = 400
December 14, 2010 at 10:39 pm #75030The answer to question 2 was SOCIE= 83890 and Balance sheet tallied at 150200……
Rest of the paper went just fine hoping for a positive result .
Its was post consolidation 4 months and pre consolidation 8 months mate.
@derrickagyiri said:
i made a huge mistake … i apportioned the month for the consolidation wronglyPre inquisition is said 4 month and post acquisition i said 8 month
how bad have i fuck up mates .. someone tell me π
December 14, 2010 at 10:44 pm #75031Very good paper this round, sadly dont matter how hard i tried i could not manage my time well, so i’m pretty sure i failed and wasted this nice paper.
Time to buy new books, pay for new lectures and get ready to learn the new syllabus.
December 15, 2010 at 12:29 am #75032AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- β
December 15, 2010 at 1:12 am #75033AnonymousInactive- Topics: 1
- Replies: 90
- ββ
okay..for Q3..I din take out those 1 off cost and etc.. din mention bout loan ..the rate and etc…
am I screwed? I only discuss based on the ratio as stated in FS.December 15, 2010 at 1:58 am #75034AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- β
was it really 4 months and 8 months , i got 3 and 9
December 15, 2010 at 3:30 am #75035AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
jus glad dats over..merry xmas everyone!!!
December 15, 2010 at 3:54 am #75036@lawless75 said:
was it really 4 months and 8 months , i got 3 and 93?? how it was 1st June to 30 Sep
December 15, 2010 at 5:28 am #75037AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- β
The paper was ok but like everyone else time is the issue with this one.
2x SOFP, 2 x SOTI, SOCE, Ratios & Interpretation, Two theory questions….in three hours! I would nearly rather have three hard questions in three hours.
Glad to be finished and am praying for a pass…This is my only exam left before I do P2!!! Not looking forward to June either way!! π
Well at least I can put up a tree today!!
December 15, 2010 at 6:36 am #75038Great exam, easy I would say but could only really attempt and finish 75% of the paper so just looking up to God!
Easy exam but time was the BIG issue!!!
December 15, 2010 at 9:04 am #75039I agree with you guys totally that the exam paper was easy. But for me (sat 4 exams this sitting) this was the most time consuming and demanding. Yes the questions were fair in terms of difficulty level but what is the point of giving a paper that is too hard to finish in time. I’m talking about overall, because there will be ppl who could finish this within 3hrs but not too many.
2 sets of complete accounts with one being a consolidation, the examiner is having a laugh. Overall I think this was a bad exam for Steve, pass rate will probably remain the same. Easy paper:Very short time so lots of ppl will lose marks which they wouldve got otherwise, including me. Conclusion? easy but if you can’t finish in time then it’s not really fair. Q1 should’ve only been an SFP or SCI not flippin’ both.
Let’s hope we can pass, I only attempted 80% of the paper. God willing I’ll be smiling come February next year.
December 15, 2010 at 11:07 am #75040AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- β
The paper overall was a fair paper. but 3 hours to do all that work is really asking alot.
Q1. balanced the SOFP at 63,000. not sure i dealt with the negative FV Adjustment properly though
Q2. didnt bother to tally the SOFP. took too much time on workings for provision and the other adjs
December 15, 2010 at 11:30 am #75041AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
Fair paper. I managed to attempted all question but i did mess it up on the time apportioned. Am i going to loss a lot of marks?
December 15, 2010 at 12:11 pm #75042Yeah there was a greater loss of $0.6m using AVCO. The $2m that the assistant got was from switching the beginning and ending inventory around and mixing up AVCO and FIFO.
You will def score some marks for working that out. π
December 15, 2010 at 2:26 pm #75043AnonymousInactive- Topics: 5
- Replies: 5
- β
big time
December 15, 2010 at 2:35 pm #75044AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- β
Can someone tell me if we really need to get new books? I am asssuming that any changaes in the syllabus are of a theoretical nature and the examiner will write about it in student accountant? Please shed some light
December 15, 2010 at 5:16 pm #75045AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
new in this site and on ACCA, i will be registering tomorrow…
December 15, 2010 at 6:30 pm #75046AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- β
Is it just me or does anyone else think that these exams are really just about people’s ability to perform under a ridiculous amount of time pressure (the art of accounting seems seconday). Where is the value in rushing through five questions with no time to think, doing a paper which is practically impossible to finish unless you are a robot, and just spilling out adjustments you hoped you’ve memorised and chase marks like a demented person!! I just said 45 mins per question, rushed like maniac hoping that the hours of study were not a complete waste of time. Does this make for a good accountant….I think not…if I treated my clients accounts this way I’d be fired!!!!!
December 15, 2010 at 7:30 pm #75047Does anyone know when the exams will be out? I want to see mark allocation.
And one more question:
Have anyone written about impairment loss in question five? I remembered that after the property is held for sale if the fair value less costs to sell is less than carrying amount than the impairment loss should be recognised.Thanks in advnace for responding
December 15, 2010 at 9:14 pm #75048Guys despite the horrors of examinations, we are aspiring accounts with a Professional Code of Ethics and Behaviour which guides our behaviour. We need to watch our language derrickagyiri ! We don’t want to damage the image of Open Tuition which has been quite helpful to students.
December 15, 2010 at 9:27 pm #75049 - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.