Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA ATX Advanced Taxation Forums › *** P6 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 143 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- June 5, 2015 at 10:58 pm #254241
After tax proceeds are sale proceeds minus CGT
not
gain minus CGTJune 5, 2015 at 11:05 pm #254243He did not have any AE left, it stated it was used each year.
June 5, 2015 at 11:38 pm #254249It stated how he would have £30k to invest in his daughters trust, after all taxes not 800 odd shares.
June 5, 2015 at 11:40 pm #254251AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 42
- ☆
@shuva123 said:
question five – what did anyone have for the CGT arising basis versus remittance basis???i think remitence basis is not apply… it is normal cgt calculation…………………………………………………………….
The person was resident but not UK domiciled.
Arising basis was automatic and he gets PA/ AEBut he can elect to use the remitence basis which is automatic for any income equal or less than £2,000.
He looses his PA/AE and also a remittance basis charge of
£30,000 if he’s lived in UK 7 out of 9 years
£50,00 if he’s lived in UK 12 out of 14 years.Now I think I counted the years he’s lived in Uk wrong. I’ve forgotten the year he got married.
But I said he lived in UK only 7 years and therefore pays no remittence charge. All the £70,000 gain may not be taxed and only his £10,000 (equal to PA) UK income taxed.
He therfore pays a £2,000 (20% *10,000)
But he would have paid £16,590 ((5736(18% * 31865) +((10854 (28% * (70,000 -11,000- 31,865))June 5, 2015 at 11:48 pm #254253AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 42
- ☆
@gasengine said:
I appear to be the odd-one-out, but I believe the Substantial Shareholding Exemption DID apply to the disposal in question 3, owing to the FA2011 changes to SSE. Namely, the qualifying 12 month period can include the time when the assets owned by the company being sold were used within a trade carried on by the group before being transferred to the company being sold.Hence, the time that the trade was carried on by the predecessor company (Aero?) may count towards the qualifying period.
Am I missing the point?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
I said the same. The business and it’s property were transfered from a 75% relief group and this now domant company had held the business 12 months prior to the NGNL transfer.
Therefore the group held the shares for 2 years hence qualify for SSE.June 6, 2015 at 2:09 am #254264No wonder I ran out out time trying to work out the SSE on the building transferred and the degrouping charge. There was no gain to calculate. Who did you study or which books did you use. Did you know anything joint associates?
June 6, 2015 at 4:59 am #254273AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
this was the worst paper in acca
June 6, 2015 at 7:03 am #254300AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 14
- ☆
Hi,pliz be kind and remind me what question 4 was about something Is telling coz of stress I started it and left it,meaning I only answered 3 questions pliz.
I am really stressing about it
June 6, 2015 at 7:21 am #254310AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 52
- ☆☆
@shuva123 said:
q1 i think this will be automatic uk residence status and temporary non uk resident for capital gain tax purpose. terminal relief is 24500. relief by current yr and lifo basis,maximum 3yrs,ppr relief is exampted, 6000 rules is apply,and normal capital gain tax calculation… vat not charged if transfer is going concern….other wise 20 percent vat charged is applicable…thisis q1. q2 i missed the degrouping charge….is it degrouping charge? sse not apply coz 12 months not fullfilled out of 2 yrs before sale…is it non trading loan relationship? roll over relief is available if sale the capital gain group. m i ry8? q3 i missed the 2 option…i dont understand this ques. deminimis limt was good. test2 is considers, i also aplly for advice that capital good scheme. there was pertial examt business. but i dint know. q5 was child care voucher, miles,i just overall disscussed.nic 2 percent and income tax 40 percent apply..badges of trade is apply.pls share ur answer….it just for disscus? ques was really different from previous past papers….for q1 she was non uk resident for the tax year 2016/17 and terminal loss relief needs to be directly carried back for 3 years. It was partially non-trading loan relationship and also ROR is not available because tehe asset was never used in the business.
Paper was really different this time, no partnership, no losses, no BOA thankGOD 😛
June 6, 2015 at 7:24 am #254311AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 52
- ☆☆
@hutchy1978 said:
PPR fully exempt or only half as her land was one hectare??I only realised that on the way home .
Question five – what did anyone have for the CGT arising basis versus remittance basis???
For the PPE, it was fully exempt as she had stayed in her house for her whole life.
Q5- Yeah i compared both arising and RBC with the Remittance basis charge.
June 6, 2015 at 7:39 am #254318What did everyone get to for q5 income tax part? It said something about the after tax and NI cost, and seemed a bit easy for 9 marks. Was it the salary, plus and NI relating to excess mileage and other benefits? I also pro rated the NI employment allowance and applied a bit of that
June 6, 2015 at 7:52 am #254320AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 14
- ☆
I gutted I did not see the overlap to make my terminal loss 24500, I hope they will only penalise me once n mark the rest of my loos relief
June 6, 2015 at 8:56 am #254366AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 52
- ☆☆
@carl29 said:
What did everyone get to for q5 income tax part? It said something about the after tax and NI cost, and seemed a bit easy for 9 marks. Was it the salary, plus and NI relating to excess mileage and other benefits? I also pro rated the NI employment allowance and applied a bit of thatYeah it was kind of easy, anything relating to employee is deductible expense from the Income tax, and that NIC on benefit i think was less than 2000, hence i wrote that she did not have to pay.
For the annual tax cost i just calculated the IT liability, didn’t know what he actually meant by ‘tax cost’ 😛
June 6, 2015 at 8:57 am #254367AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 52
- ☆☆
@barbs1020 said:
I gutted I did not see the overlap to make my terminal loss 24500, I hope they will only penalise me once n mark the rest of my loos reliefDefinately, you will loose just 1 mark, remaining you will get marks for the process 🙂
June 6, 2015 at 9:19 am #254377@paullu618
@rebecca211) Samuel is planning to leave the UK to live overseas, having always previously been resident in the UK. He will not automatically be treated as either resident in the UK or not resident in the UK. Samuel has several ties with the UK and will need to visit the UK for 60 days each tax year. However, he wants to be not resident after he leaves the UK.
For the first two tax years after leaving the UK, what is the maximum number of ties which Samuel could keep with the UK without being treated as resident in the UK?A One
B Four
C Two
D ThreeI think the answer is C as he was a previous resident if he have 3 ties he will be a resident!!!
June 6, 2015 at 9:23 am #254384AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 14
- ☆
Thank u so much u have made my day.
June 6, 2015 at 10:11 am #254435@hershey said:
Yeah it was kind of easy, anything relating to employee is deductible expense from the Income tax, and that NIC on benefit i think was less than 2000, hence i wrote that she did not have to pay.For the annual tax cost i just calculated the IT liability, didn’t know what he actually meant by ‘tax cost’ 😛
It was the net cost to cate of hiring the employee.
She was earning (£90,000 + Dividends) £120,000 and therefore her PA was abated. Once she hires someone her profits fall and thus she gets her PA so effectively she’ll pay less tax and this is a tax saving.So i put thar the net cost should be cost of hiring the employee less tax saving to the business less the tax saving for Cate as the Q specifically asked the net cost for Cate for D desgin hiring the temp staff.
June 6, 2015 at 10:27 am #254438AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 28
- ☆
Wasn’t D Designs a ltd co??
Hence the dividend??
June 6, 2015 at 10:40 am #254442AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 14
- ☆
Hey,Hershey,pliz remind me again roughly wat question 4 was about I m getting a horrible feeling I only answered three ?,sorry to stress u
June 6, 2015 at 11:32 am #254465@hutchy1978 said:
Wasn’t D Designs a ltd co??Hence the dividend??
As far as i remember she was a sole trader.
Thats why the question said what was the cost to cate for D Designs employing a part time employee.For 9 marks it would have been very easy then!
June 6, 2015 at 11:33 am #254467Does anyone know how long it takes for ACCA to upload the questions?
June 6, 2015 at 11:38 am #254471AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 28
- ☆
But a sole trader wouldn’t or can’t take dividends??
Dividends are from a ltd co surely??
I was rushing by the time I go to question fiveJune 6, 2015 at 11:39 am #254473she recieves dividends from elsewhere. as far as i remember.
June 6, 2015 at 11:42 am #254474Also since she had 6 full time employees I assumed employment allowance was used up and therefore not availabe for the part time employee.
June 6, 2015 at 11:45 am #254475AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 28
- ☆
Obviously read it wrong – I thought she received 27.000 dividenda from d design..
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** P6 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.