Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA APM Advanced Performance Management Forums › *** P5 December 2012 Exam *** Instant Poll and comments***
- This topic has 120 replies, 69 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by admin.
- AuthorPosts
- December 9, 2012 at 4:51 pm #110492
calc eva
operating profit 68
tax(68*.25) (17)
provision 2
research and dev 12
amortization12/5 (2.4)
non cash exp 7
depriciation 59
economic dep (83)
tax 0.5
NOPAT 46.1capitl employed: 637
non cash exp 6
provision 2.5
C.E = 645.5wacc =8.65
EVA 46.1-(8.65*645.5)=(9.7)
December 9, 2012 at 4:58 pm #110493calculated wrong roce on the basis of overall operating profit of 68 which breached the limit 8.7% and then commented on this e.g fines would be imposed ………how much marks would be deducted…..
impact of such constraints:unethical practices
reduction in quality
up side is that they will reduce cost using value anlaysis and bpr ……. plz comment on the suitability of the answer angry hamtaroDecember 9, 2012 at 5:09 pm #110494what measures were to suggest in q1 b
December 9, 2012 at 10:03 pm #110495AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
h
@sheharyar123 said:
what measures were to suggest in q1 b@sheharyar123 said:
what measures were to suggest in q1 bDecember 9, 2012 at 10:08 pm #110496AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
Hi
in refernce to ROCE i got 8.7% as i added back finance charge.Is finance charge same as interest?
Question 1 B i suggested measures such as customer service , quality, industry average, competitors information.
i got a positive EVA.
December 9, 2012 at 10:17 pm #110497Hi @sheharyar, I must apologize because I didn’t look at the question in detail yet. If you have been applying value analysis and business process re-engineering closely to the case, then you should get worthy credit. Your point on unethical implications do hit the nail on its head.
It’s quite ironic as when the ROCE measure is used in the context of public-service companies, the ROCE measure must be kept low. When we look at the ROCE components in particular, it’s either reducing the mark-up on the water charge, or increase acquisition of assets or subsidiaries through a vertical integration in order to make operations more efficient to reduce the ROCE. (My thought is also to mention the 3E’s measurement model to link with improving public service).
Alas, it ties in with part(a) EVA requirement, which states that as you invest in assets to bring the value up of the company, it will improve EVA and impress the shareholders, who can’t use ROCE to value the worth of a utility company. The EVA management creates a more holistic and ethical public service value-based management behaviour. You can see ROCE is bringing the current management to the wrong direction, and this is clearly not the shareholders would have wanted!
I can see that this can potentially be a very difficult question if one does not keep abreast with read up on news relating to the regulation of the water utility industry. It’s quite interesting that Alex Watt seems to release questions based on a trend of current issues – Ofwat, the water regulator in UK has been hot on the news since 2011. A similar situation exists in my country where the state water company was under immense pressure to reduce price of water despite increasing operational costs, and the inefficiencies of assets employed eventually led to a nearly acute water shortage.
Otherwise it’s safe enough to attempt this question beautifully if you understand EVA and the dysfunctional management behavior of using ROCE.
(ps: Alex Watt still loves cracking our soft heads!)
December 10, 2012 at 12:27 pm #110498AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
i think the exam was fair, the only problem was time pressure. i really think Alex wanted us to pass this time, so i hope i get that 50%.
December 10, 2012 at 1:18 pm #110499@wl.obu,@elliem,@msamelia and others who use NFPM non financial performance measures like those in building block model for Q1,b I used the same recomendation too by saying these should be used in conjuction with other financial measures so that over all company to have very good perfomance encompacing major objectives and stakeholders need.So cheers! we will surely get some marks for that.In General it is very difficult to write without thinking what exactly the requirements are and what the examiner is looking for are usually in between the lines and deep in the widely /large scenario so the very challenging thing remains time pressure ….
December 10, 2012 at 6:53 pm #110500AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
I didnt write about NFPI at all :(.. thats worrying me
December 10, 2012 at 6:53 pm #110501AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
I didnt write about NFPI at all :(.. thats worrying me
December 10, 2012 at 9:25 pm #110502@angryhamtoro but the company has turned into a private ownership why use 3E as its only government regulations involved not thier funding …….its purely a commercial organization now
December 10, 2012 at 9:26 pm #110503@angryhamtoro but the company has turned into a private ownership why use 3E as its only government regulations involved not thier funding …….its purely a commercial organization now
December 10, 2012 at 9:29 pm #110504could u plz guide us about the Q1b ….i disscussed conrolabillity principle,ROI which includes conrollable profits and investments,and EVA which will make inter divisional comparisons easiers by adjustments and foster long tem behaviour in their management and is more alligned to shareholder wealth maximization…..no non financial disscussed
December 10, 2012 at 11:29 pm #110505@sheharyar, I suppose the co is still being monitored under the water regulator, so just saying 3E should be useful, but I won’t go further into it anyway. 🙂
December 11, 2012 at 6:58 am #110506AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
I did really well in the papers. In question no 1 i suggested that In place of Net income we can use Fitzeberg and moon dimensions like innovation, creativity, resource utilization etc to measure the performance as the company was providing services (marketing). Its better then ROCE RI and netincome. I also mentioned other financial measures too. Overall paper was ok except q2 lets hope for the best.
December 11, 2012 at 3:46 pm #110507@tabi21, yeah got the feeling P5 passing rate will significantly improve this sitting. 🙂
December 11, 2012 at 8:13 pm #110508AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
Thank you angryhamtaro. Good to know they can use magnify tool. 🙂
December 12, 2012 at 6:28 pm #110509AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- ☆
i am worried that the exam time allocation is too small as compared to the requirements especially Q1 and 2. I could not do the whole 20marks and i fear that the horrible performance for the questions will not earn me pass. This is my fourth sitting to this paper i hope the examiner will recognise my effort. Ofcourse i did a lot of writing in section A.
December 13, 2012 at 4:49 am #110510AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 12
- ☆
me, too! This is my fourth sitting to this paper- the greatest No. of sitting which i have even sit for 1 ACCA paper, so, do hope that examiners will be generous this time and give us a pass mark.
@fabakary said:
i am worried that the exam time allocation is too small as compared to the requirements especially Q1 and 2. I could not do the whole 20marks and i fear that the horrible performance for the questions will not earn me pass. This is my fourth sitting to this paper i hope the examiner will recognise my effort. Ofcourse i did a lot of writing in section A.January 17, 2013 at 1:34 pm #113804AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Where is the poll?????
January 17, 2013 at 3:56 pm #113812polls are now closed, https://opentuition.com/community/polls/
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** P5 December 2012 Exam *** Instant Poll and comments***’ is closed to new replies.