- This topic has 49 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
.
- Posts
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 9
- ☆
Hi I would like to join this study group as well. I will be writing this paper for the forth time in December 2010
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 9
- ☆
Hi I would like to join this study group as well. I will be writing this paper for the forth time in December 2010
@choissure said:
Hi I would like to join this study group as well. I will be writing this paper for the forth time in December 2010write your e-mail please
Count Me In …………..
My email add is ahsan1379@gmail.comCount me too in the group study. Please do mention of the dates and topics that would be discussed in advance so everyone could brush through the topics. Please do specify the book followed too.
Thank you.
@rachellai said:
How to join? please tell me…..please to send your e-mail
my e-mail is
h.hafez@suezcem.com
you will receive the mentioned files
see you next weekHamdy
EgyptCould someone please tell me when are the group study sessions going on as on the dates. I guess I have lost a lot as it looks likes it started from Aug 20th.
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 3
- ☆
i hope i m not late, count me in too…. i have just started studying p4.. n i m starting from the investment appraisal basics in f9..
my email address is roxannekoo@yahoo.com.sg
pls count me in
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
I am in
My mail is sallyk28@hotmail.com- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
Is it better to study from Bpp or kaplan
thanks
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
could you count me in
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 12
- ☆
When i read the new examiner’s approach, and his example question, i think it’s very difficult. Using the BSOP to calculate the real option of the project–I wish before the exam, i can think of what model to use in diffrent scenarios…
- Topics: 7
- Replies: 24
- ☆
@Hamdy_Hafez said:
I’ll try to prepare a timetable tomorrowwe are yet to get the timetable. It seems Ming is no longer available as she has been off for a while. Kindly give us clear direction on how we’ll take the P4 study group sessions.
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 10
- ☆
Dear All…
I have gone through the new article on examiners approach written by shishir malde where i came across with few problems relating to the sample question.
1- I did not understand the calculation of WACC (discount rate). Help me understand this equation of WACC = (15.08% × 364 + 6% × 0.8 × 156)/520 = 12%.
WACC = Ke × E/E+D
Ke = 15.08%
MV of Equity = 364
MV of Debt = 156
E = ? —-> 364 is the MV of equity then what is reason of addition of (6% × 0.8 × 156) in 364.2- As the NPV of the whole project is Negative 9,359,000/-. So if we calculate the value of the project with SIC’s offer to buy the project on completion of the two years development phase then why examiner has deducted whole negative NPV figure (9,359,000)? As negative NPV (9,359,000) relates to the whole 5 years project and SIC’s offer to buy the project is after completion of the two years development phase.
I hope i made my questions clear.
Thanks- Topics: 2
- Replies: 10
- ☆
My email address is
asad_usman@msn.comThanks
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Hi all
I am studying by my self P4. Who know how to calculate In(Pa/Pd)? thanks
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Count me in for this group.
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
hey
I wish to join this group.I’m doing self study, and after being slaughtered by the June exams I will take any help I can get. Where exactly are you on the syllabus?- Topics: 2
- Replies: 10
- ☆
@ SERENE JIANG said:
I think WACC should be (Ke*E+Vd*D)/E+D…that’s why the examiner added up the cost of debt(6% loan )
Isn’t it…?Yeah, right. Thank you so very much. I was not taking into account the cost of debt, actually i got lost into the bit confusing way, the examiner has adopted to solve the WACC equation. With the hint of cost of debt, i calculated the WACC with simple WACC equation (WACC = (Ke * E/E+D) + (Kd * D/E+D)).
You have answered the problem # 1, but please help me understanding the problem # 2 i have mentioned in my same post.
For your convenience, i am reproducing it.
2- As the NPV of the whole project is Negative 9,359,000/-. So if we calculate the value of the project with SIC’s offer to buy the project on completion of the two years development phase then why examiner has deducted whole negative NPV figure (9,359,000)? As negative NPV (9,359,000) relates to the whole 5 years project and SIC’s offer to buy the project is after completion of the two years development phase.
your early response would be much valued.
Thanks.
i m also in group study .ok. time table should be set lik this that it must be flexible and realistic , coz most of us will b having other papers as well..and secondly v should finish text book and after that move for prac ques coz ques are covering diff random chapters
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
Hi, I have a query. In P4 June 2007 Paper there is a question named: Greffer Inc.
The answer to this question is little confusing in the sense that to get accounting profit, you would not deduct capital allowances. CAs are only allowed to arrive at the taxed number. Hence Profit before tax would be different to the one given and so the growth in profit on a pre-tax basis would be 14.6% and 13.6% in the 2nd and 3rd years respectively and so the answer changes to the fact that the company does not meet its financial target of growing at 20% (pre-tax basis) from Year 1. Please sombody ponder over this and help me clear my confusion.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.