Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBL Strategic Business Leader Forums › *** P3 December 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 65 replies, 44 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by D.
- AuthorPosts
- December 10, 2015 at 8:27 pm #290611
@dannyw1984 said:
I was in about 4 minds for question one.I had originally read the case study and started marking down benefits and advantages for the QTS group (or whatever they were called). It was then I realised you had to offer the benefits and advantages of QTS buying A2K π
So I thought of a SAF approach, but didn’t as yet ONLY wanted the benefits and advantages, only the good things, and with a full SAF you can bring out negatives. They didn’t have the staff to run their own company, let alone enough staff to take on the new one and set it all up etc, although they would pick up staff.
I was going to use a BCG with the market share and growth, but BCG shows A2K as a dog – low market growth and low relative market share.
So I just picked out 4 or 5 relevant advantages – appeasing the shareholders by growing, maximising wealth, bringing in a team to run their e-learning packages etc.
Overall, was a very long question. I didn’t even start writing an answer till after 10.30am.
And one of the requirements for question one was asking for an explanation of culture, the culture web and mintzberg, for both the companies before and after acquisition all for about 12 marks. Was a LOT to do π
I did question 4 next as 2 and 3 freaked me out.
I then realised question 2 was just a cost and benefit analysis.
2 part b was trickier though.
My first attempt at P3, felt comfortable enough, but very time pressured.
Same^ was getting so many ideas but question keep ringing a bell in my head “Only Benefits & advantages” so couldn’t freely use any model…
btw for Q4b, institutional shareholder’s comments on strategy used by Sarah, what major points u mentioned ? i couldnt get much, may be because i just quickly went thru it, but i just got like few 3-4 points there…
December 10, 2015 at 8:30 pm #290614I mean it was afterall the best strategy to divest that Property business, it was loss making, it was a dog through BCG matrix, it was taking up unnecessary costs with having to retain those useless managing staff to run it …. there wasnt much to say to counter the “divest” strategy… it was just plain liability for the portfolio of bank brothers…so i couldnt really mention any real points there in favor of the shareholders remarks.. ??!?!? :S
December 10, 2015 at 8:48 pm #290643Err the shareholder’s comments were meant to relate to the CSR shown by the charitable donation and had nothing to to with the divestment of the property business. At least I hope?
December 10, 2015 at 9:15 pm #290687any model relevant to Q1 part A ?
December 10, 2015 at 9:16 pm #290689It was related to CSR
December 10, 2015 at 9:24 pm #290697Luckily I had smashed out a load of CSR revision for P1, but it didn’t appear there at all. So when I saw it here I was semi happy.
I said what CSR was and the question was VERY leading into the donation to the charity being a strategic CSR strategy.
Donating to a finance charity which helps people who have suffered financial difficulties in the past would mean that by investing in them and teaching them then in the long term it would be dividends as they are less likely to get into financial difficultly again and thus would reduce potential bad debts.
This was a long term strategic plan
The institutional shareholders were concerned as the bank wasn’t being strategic and was basically robbing the shareholders of their own money – this is a pristine capitalist viewpoint. All of the money should be given to the shareholders and the bank is stealing from them.
However, the shareholders needed to realise the CSR strategy was strategic, which would in the long run benefit them and bring them more profit and rewards.
December 10, 2015 at 9:30 pm #290704I think Question 1 most models would have been applicable and even not to mention any models because the question was just asking about benefits and advantages . Ashridge model is what i used in terms of benefit and feel and i think other models would still be ok.
December 10, 2015 at 9:57 pm #290742That is what i wrote as well, i think i did well on that question.
December 10, 2015 at 10:05 pm #290752Time Pressure as always- 3 page of date for question 1, could not able to assess which question to choose from the choice (confused totally)
December 10, 2015 at 10:08 pm #290755@kayheige said:
What was question 4b please, can’t remember?CSR
December 10, 2015 at 10:32 pm #290770I took an hour just trying tounderstand the scenario. It was too long. I failed to distinguish an advantage and benefit for q1 part a . other wise it was a fair exam though time pressured. just praying for a 50.
December 10, 2015 at 11:12 pm #290775This was my 3rd attempt in P3 and went even worse than the last 2. I found it very hard to properly apply the info in Q1 to the requirements. I am so demotivated and depressed now :'(
December 10, 2015 at 11:16 pm #290777@tich2010 said:
That is what i wrote as well, i think i did well on that question.Which question?
December 10, 2015 at 11:58 pm #290780Question 4 on the institutional shareholder and the bank of which i wrote that the institutional shareholder was of pristines view that shareholders wealth is for them only and to put it to other uses as suggested by Sarah if i can remember the name was stealing. The suggestion by the bank to assist those who had financial difficulties was a good corporate strategy as the banks which had been receiving negative publicity might be able to improve its reputation. Once reputation is improved the bank will in the long run benefit from customers who would in my opinion wants to be associated with a bank that would help them in the future when things are hard. As a result in the long run the bank will benefit .
December 11, 2015 at 12:07 am #290781@dannyw1984 said:
Luckily I had smashed out a load of CSR revision for P1, but it didn’t appear there at all. So when I saw it here I was semi happy.I said what CSR was and the question was VERY leading into the donation to the charity being a strategic CSR strategy.
Donating to a finance charity which helps people who have suffered financial difficulties in the past would mean that by investing in them and teaching them then in the long term it would be dividends as they are less likely to get into financial difficultly again and thus would reduce potential bad debts.
This was a long term strategic plan
The institutional shareholders were concerned as the bank wasn’t being strategic and was basically robbing the shareholders of their own money – this is a pristine capitalist viewpoint. All of the money should be given to the shareholders and the bank is stealing from them.
However, the shareholders needed to realise the CSR strategy was strategic, which would in the long run benefit them and bring them more profit and rewards.
Wow, very good answer. I was running out of time for that part so ended up blagging it.
I think the paper was okay however was very time pressured and with regards to models I didn’t really use any in particular models. Any difficult parts I just moved on as that has been my downfall in other papers.
December 11, 2015 at 1:13 am #290792AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- β
Q1a. Benefits and Advantages to QTS and QTSBA
– This should be in a briefing paper format so I made sure I have the report format; Title, subject, author, date, introduction and conclusion.
– Advantages and benefits to QTS
. QTS may be able to exploit its core competencies and unique resources to achieve even greater profitability
. QTS will consolidate and become even a strong market leader
. QTS has good experience in managing acquisitions and making them profitable post acquisition and as such will be able to do the same for A2K– Advantages to QTSBA
. Synergies
. Access to experienced A2K trainers
. QTSBA will be able to service the 2 government contract with A2K trainers
. QTSBA will be able to rekindle its e-learning products which was unsuccessful at their first trial
. The e-learning product is a new product development
. Access to the guruQ1b. Contextual factors:
– Time : There is no time, as QTSBA need the trainers to service the govt contract ASAP
– Readiness : Its ready. Its has the resources in place to execute the change
– Capability : QTSBA has no experience and skill set. However, the parent QTS has the experience and skill set. They’ve manage previous acquisitions successfully
– Diversity – diversity of experience and opinion.
– Preservation : aspect of A2K operations/ business model that would be preservedQ1c. Organizational culture = ways of doing things within the orgn; this can be seen within the facets of the cultural web such as Stories, Routines and rituals, Power structure, organizational structure, control system etc. Didn’t do much as this was my last question and I was running out of time
Q4a. Weakness and Threats:
– Weakness:
. Declining revenue
. Declining operating margin
. Unstable Board
. High Staff turnover of property agency
. Difficulty of banks employees adopting to the culture of the property agency
. The later resulted in further staff turnover of the banks staff– Threats:
. Volatility of property prices
. Threats of government legislation
. Potential Increasing interest rates
. Declining property sales within the market
.Q4b. Social corporate responsibility. I didn’t do much
. CSR will enhance reputation
. Investors are now paying attentions to CSR in their investment decisions.
. Donations are not in the best interest of shareholders
. Institutional shareholders and Sara are in conflict.
. Institutional shareholders have high power and high interest and can replace Sara (the CEO) with someone who will serve their best interest and maximize shareholders wealthQ2a. Evaluation of cost benefit analysis:
– Payback period. I gave the disadvantages
– Comments on almost all the cost and benefits except the last benefit (I don’t remember)
. Hardware cost
. Software cost
. Time spent in obtaining quotes were subjectiveQ2b. Purpose contents and importance of project plan
– purpose; to determine who, how, when, what, to be done
– Contents ; I screwed this one up but managed to get some right. objective, resources, deliverables, project participants, constraints, scope, etc.
Importance: I screwed this one too but related it to the case so hopefully I should get some marks.Overall, fair paper but too time pressured
December 11, 2015 at 2:30 am #290795Q1 b TIME,READINESS,CAPABILITY,DIVERSITY
December 11, 2015 at 6:52 am #290807Does anyone write about scalability, easy to upgrade, usability, easy access to maintenance and capability to render the inventory system effectively as part of appraising the cost / benefit analysis in question 2.
December 11, 2015 at 7:29 am #290820Getting set for March 2016
December 11, 2015 at 8:35 am #290835For question one I did the benefit/fit matrix and identified it as a value trap. Despite obvious issues the md was saying it had benefit enough. The fit was obviously high as they were doing the same with same r and c and ten backed up my high benefit selection with a list of advantages:
1)having contracts to fulfil with few staff and a2k had freelances advice that could help, well as the team it had already built.
2)acquiring the e learning was motivational for ash tag and his team who felt unappreciated and for qtbsa as they wanted to go into this market.
)3)they were acquiring a competitor and they market share shares would now be 60%+ (based on revenues given).
4) a2k had fallen below the market f average of 10%NoP and qtbsa had ability to acquire and improve and it has done in the past to help a2k (it said benefits to both).
5) that as there r n c was acquiring and was there previous strategy its was acceptable and feasible.
That’s lol I got for 19 or 16 marks hoping for more than one one through application of model and use of financial.
Was a long paper!
December 11, 2015 at 10:49 am #290875Q1a : a lot benefits..
1. Access to the guru
2. ROCE average is higher than market rate..So possibility bring in better ROCE ratio
3. e-learning software team
4. experienced trainer
5. e-learning team in a2k is underperformed, if its merged QTS can solve the problem and restore the normal performance ..as the team is demotivated, highly underperformed1b , accordance to the diagram
1c only wrote organisation culture, web, and some organisation configuration(structure of a2k)
Q3a
Obviously this question is easy …the process is so easily identified ..number 3 process..redundancy for posting another deadline ..number 9 ..the sorting is unwanted..providing no value ..instead should create an assignment mailbox online for each respective lecturer ..direct submit to lecturer …and lecturer direct download and mark the assignment
the process of submit, record, download feedback is in wrong sequence!the lecturer should record all the marks first..then submit online …then make it available for student to download for review…
16 marks…easily bagged in
1b not much written, i just wrote lecturer need training
Q4a
external analysis : PESTEL model, internal analysis: weak management and financial performance
1b CSR , Sarah trying to improve bank’s reputation, shareholder thinks that it is waste of money…solution: Sarah should tell what is the benefit of doing this..like legitimacy theory ..the bank aint doing charity for nothing…it must have its purpose ..
Thats what i wrote in the exam yesterday briefly …Hope you guys can pass π
December 11, 2015 at 2:46 pm #290933Question 1 was too much information to swallow. I did the options first to try gain marks. But question 1 had none of the usual models was a surprise. Crossing my fingers and hoping for the best.
December 11, 2015 at 3:33 pm #290984Thank you for the specific details of the exam question – How did you manage to remember the specifics? Well done
Question re 1 C Did the question relate to A2K or QTS or both ???
Q1c. Organizational culture = ways of doing things within the orgn; this can be seen within the facets of the cultural web such as Stories, Routines and rituals, Power structure, organizational structure, control system etc. Didnβt do much as this was my last question and I was running out of time
December 11, 2015 at 3:52 pm #291014I left 15 marks behind because of time, obviously bad time management, therefore it’s a fail. π
December 11, 2015 at 4:21 pm #291044Used different perspective on Q1 than previous posters – was thinking about BCG, SAF and Ashridge, but it seemed to easy to just outline benefits & advantages. So did a bit different way:
Q1(a) – SWOT for QTS & QTSBA combined – outlined strengths, weekneses and opportunities and threats in relation to acquiring A2K. Then used TOWS to outline how acquiring and merging A2K with QTSBA would: a) bring trainers, which are scarce resource, b) cost synergies – admin, sales&mark, back office, c) e-learning team, which QTSBA lacks, d) new perspective on courses (humorous and challenging, compared to QTS’s structured offering) – could broaden the niche/expand category, e) bringing mgt team and empowering trainers/e-learning – quick fixes, f) improving profitability through synergies outlined above – A2K had lower profitability than the group, therefore had to be quickly improved otherwise would dilute current results etc. – Wrote quite a bit on Q1(a) – went over about 10 mins, so had to speed up the rest to make up the time.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** P3 December 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.