Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › *** P2 June 2013 Exam was.. Post your comments ***
- This topic has 151 replies, 93 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by nkhungulu05.
- AuthorPosts
- June 11, 2013 at 4:39 pm #131648
I really let myself down!
Whilst reasonably confident with most of what I did for Q1, I spent far too long over it, the rest was a gallop and I didn’t finish.
I think I may have got in a pickle in the impairment calculation. I grossed up the goodwill but I forgot the fair value adjustment and only impaired the PPE by the 60% proportion…
I did Q2 in a rush (with limited success I expect). I certainly don’t expect to get the professional marks!
I came onto Q3 with very little time left and the leases seemed baffling to get my head around quickly so I did part (c) which was only worth 6 marks…
I will be very lucky to pass with 19 marks left out and Q2 so rushed. Very disappointed in myself as I have all first time passes up to now.June 11, 2013 at 4:43 pm #131649AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 43
- ☆
what did people do for the pension in Q1? there was a lot of information given but i just worked out present value of obligations using actuarial value of obligations ad discount factor and deducted it from fair value of plan assets to give about 4m plan deficit :S
June 11, 2013 at 5:09 pm #131667<cite>@jflan2 said:</cite>
For question 1: I did not read the question properly and thought it was a Vertical Group. will i get severely penalised i.e. 0 Mark for goodwill calculation and for part (b) used workings of part (a).Thanks
It seems to be, if you have a look at the marking scheme for past papers, that despite there being quite a lot to do to get to the goodwill figure, it’s hardly worth any marks anyway for the time and effort it takes to do it.
You won’t be penalised twice for it though, so if your calculation in part b is correct using your incorrect answer from part a, then you should get the marks for it.
June 11, 2013 at 5:12 pm #131668AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
Section A was normal BUT sec B was not easy, in ques 1 the impairment of CGU (PARK) was $300 ($2388 – $2088) and the entry is:
Dr: Cons Reserves $180 ($300 x 0.6)
Cr: Goodwill $80 (g/w attributable to Trailer)
Cr: PPE $100Am I right??
By the grace of almighty we had been compensated 30 minutes due to power failure. :p 😀June 11, 2013 at 5:14 pm #131669AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
<cite>@jazzold said:</cite>
what did people do for the pension in Q1? there was a lot of information given but i just worked out present value of obligations using actuarial value of obligations ad discount factor and deducted it from fair value of plan assets to give about 4m plan deficit :SI think you had to calculate:
*interest on defined benefit obligation (DBO) and fair value of plan asset (FVPA) = 5% * opening balance
*remeasurements (actuarial gains and losses) on DBO and FVPA = balancing figure between closing balance, opening balance and other changes mentioned (current service cost, contribution to the plan asset and payments to employee)
Then take the accounting entries:
dr P&L (current service cost + net interest cost)
dr OCI (remeasurements)
cr defined benefit liabilityJune 11, 2013 at 5:17 pm #131670AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
By the grace of almighty we had been compensated 30 minutes due to power failure. :p 😀
Lucky guys!!!
June 11, 2013 at 5:24 pm #131672AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 43
- ☆
but half of that stuff doesnt feature on the SFP?
June 11, 2013 at 5:33 pm #131673AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
<cite>@jazzold said:</cite>
but half of that stuff doesnt feature on the SFP?The entry for P&L reflects Retained earnings in SFP and OCI reflects Other components of equity (or again Retained earnings – I have seen both presentation)
June 11, 2013 at 5:34 pm #131674AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 43
- ☆
makes sense i suppose
June 11, 2013 at 5:41 pm #131675AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
“Exam was ok, but I was not good”, “Fair enough, but not enough time” – are you kidding?
BE HONEST This was a disaster!Q1 part A was time and mind killer and then part B, based on that goodwill that
was messed up in part A!
I made only one fatal mistake – tried to do consolidation workings, should have skipped,
maybe there would be any chance to pass then.See you next year!
June 11, 2013 at 6:06 pm #131677Just rememberd question 1 on ethics. Absolute gift of a question. 6 marks on saying something like “this director believes that accountants do not need to study ethics. Also discuss if the misappropriation of profits is an ethical issue?”
What a gift.
I put down PIPCO ethical guidelines and said not statig correct profits is against
1. Directors fiduciary responsibility
2. His ethical guidelines spelt out by his relative body (PIPCO.)Hopefully I got full marks on that.
June 11, 2013 at 6:20 pm #131680AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
Well I definitely tried my best but as always there were a few bits which I was unsure about. What did everyone do with the following?……
1. The loan at a reduced rate
2. The restructuring, did you provide for both plans (excluding training)?
3. Were the segments to be split in question 2a?
4. Did you disclose a contingent liability or not for the damage costs? Then a provision?June 11, 2013 at 6:21 pm #131681AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
yh SOFP again, he will never do cash flow especially when everyone is saying cash flow this time. but again i didn’t do well. forgot how to deal with that impairment thing, and few other adj,
i got goodwill of park 80 too, but didn’t know how to get the impairment (although i did the similar Q twice from exam kit, still kicking myself , but don’t want to check it again now coz I can’t ask for my paper back and change it , 😛 )
Although I didn’t do well myself, i think the paper was fair , anyone who prepare well would pass easily. (but not when you start finding the note one week before exam , lol )
will have to wait and see the result , but might have to resit .. (the thought of it make me want to run away from ACCA )
For those of you who finish the exam , let’s just be happy that it’s over and celebrate 🙂
And people who still have P1 tomorrow , good luck.
June 11, 2013 at 6:25 pm #131682AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
<cite> @faizan said:</cite>
I used the 2012 figures for caller too as it become a subsidiary after the parent bought park. The impairement thing was 2220 – 2088 right? or you use 2088 (one guy used this)btw someone here said q3 was about provisions.. no it was not about provision but held for sale which was kept in that state for more than 12 months and the company wanted it to still be classified as held for sale even when it was transfering activities to the subsidiary.
I did 2220 + (non dep land from FV adj , 35 or 40 not remember) -2088
but so uncomfortable , feeling that I did the wrong thing ,June 11, 2013 at 6:26 pm #131684For me question one seemed very easy, usual stuff, goodwill impairment step acquisitions, deemed disposal of previous interest. Actually all parts were familiar. Only thing what I did not like is that it took a time to sort out what and when was acquired , all information seemed to be thrown in to different corners of question. Second thing employee benefits, I knew how to calculate it but the again different wording used wasted my time to sort out which is which. Examiner should make easier wording as there are lot of students who does not have English as first language. If not that wording I would finish that question 15 min earlier what I could spend better on other harder questions.
June 11, 2013 at 6:26 pm #131685AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 17
- ☆
<cite>@anamariachi said:</cite>
I got the same figures. So it is either the same mistake, either the same good approach 🙂Yep, definitely correct. GW in Sub-sub not so simple, How should one work out the indirect (42%) consideration?
Also, why was the investment of T in C $310 in the FS, when the notes indicated $260? Surely nothing to do with the charitable loan?
June 11, 2013 at 6:27 pm #131686The loan issue in Q1a, it had to be treated at amortised cost Ok? so 50+50*6%-50*3%= 51.5 ok?
Currently we have 48.5, thus the diff = 51.5-48.5 = 3 shall be treated Dt RE/ Cr Loan payable =3
The thning is that based on the question this loan was a receivable because we granted the loan to a charity, if so then it would be: 50-50*6%+50*3% = 48.5 but the scenario explicitely said that the loan is presented net of the cash paid (if loan receivable, the cash would have been received) and the loan would be 51.5.
So, I just assumed that it is payable and did it and then in the CSOFP presented it under payables.
Did anyone else noted that or I was just too under time preassure?June 11, 2013 at 6:31 pm #131614🙂 Well it was okay.
Way easier then F7 at least.I had such a big smile when i saw that SFP was examined again :))) Who expected it ? 🙂
it looks like next time nobody will already expect anything else but sfp 🙂
Time pressure was an issue only if u waste too much time in q1 . Otherwise i would not call it time pressured. At least not like i expected.
My time allocation wasn’t good as always, so i might fail …but it’s purely my fault 🙂
All in all, fair exam , thanks to examiner and thanks OT 🙂
Dont worry Ansi you should pass. I thought it will be statement of financial position,because i think examiner thinks that we all have well learned cash flows and income statement that there is no need anymore to examine it 😀
I confused about lease, was it operating or finance? After reading article I eventually decided it was an operating one? What others decided on lease?June 11, 2013 at 6:32 pm #131696AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
i got an asset in the defined benefit obligation ???? i dunno of 4 or something ….. in revaluation of office building i js revalued the building till 84 … which was the cv had there been no impairement …. i dunnu i did it right or not
June 11, 2013 at 6:32 pm #131698<cite>@d38ono said:</cite>
Well I definitely tried my best but as always there were a few bits which I was unsure about. What did everyone do with the following?……1. The loan at a reduced rate
2. The restructuring, did you provide for both plans (excluding training)?
3. Were the segments to be split in question 2a?
4. Did you disclose a contingent liability or not for the damage costs? Then a provision?The loan I discussed in my prior post
I settled provision only for Plan A, because in Plan B there was not approval like to for Plan A where the two factories were identified by the management.June 11, 2013 at 6:36 pm #131699AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 17
- ☆
Well, think I did ok with SFP.
Shame I knew none of the IAS!!!
June 11, 2013 at 6:48 pm #131702AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
i really crammed in the last month…it was a good exam not too difficult; the questions were not bad at all especially questions 2 and 3 which tested several IASs.Thought bin the clutter was coming but was too risky for me to study last minute and oh oh, question 1 really tested your understanding of when to recognize goodwill and along with a further acquisition..i could be wrong but did not caller became a member of the group when the Park acquired it. Originally it was just an investment at 14%. oh well i got totally confused at first and then settled my thoughts to come to certain realizations. I did not practice any past paper questions except for the chapter questions in kaplan but a question like this one really tested whether one understands the mechanics of group accounting.
June 11, 2013 at 6:54 pm #131704Want some suggestions…
I had done Q4 which was IFRS 12 – Disclosures but had applied P1 knowledge in Q4 a i & ii both (9 and 6 marks) .. was it right to do so??
Will I be giving marks for this??June 11, 2013 at 6:55 pm #131705AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 19
- ☆
Does anyone know what we should have done for the loan and the restructuring costs in q1??.
Also, when is the marking scheme out?
June 11, 2013 at 7:31 pm #131707<cite>@melindamarchal said:</cite>
Does anyone know what we should have done for the loan and the restructuring costs in q1??.Also, when is the marking scheme out?
For the restructuring I provided plan 1 only and with 14,000 because I excluded the training costs which are not directly related to the restructuring.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.