Forums › ACCA Forums › General ACCA Forums › *** P1 June 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 74 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
suger890.
- AuthorPosts
- June 8, 2016 at 7:36 pm #321058
Anonymous
Inactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
yes your right
was as if i was taking an auditing paperJune 8, 2016 at 8:02 pm #321096Strange paper in that it covered so little material but judging by the marking schemes there seems to be very few marks for book content with the majority going for how you interpret the scenarios.
Like others didn’t plan time too well and ended up winging it a but last q .. Best of luck to everyone.
June 8, 2016 at 8:53 pm #321152@david1988 said:
Just to add to this Q3 looked at independence and threats to independence for internal auditor in the scenario. Usual issues came up such as working for company for 10 years before joining IA (familiarity), was well like so may be scared to upset and had a close friend who was under scrutiny for theft. All of these affected his objectivity and may be complacent in his job. Also gave other side of argument where he will have good knowledge of company processes etc.Second part was looking at his role as a NED and effectiveness.
Lastly we had to describe the roles of audit committee and the relationship with internal audit. First part was usual financial audit, internal control review, reviewing external audit independence, fees paid and provision of non audit services etc. Relationship with internal audit was that they monitor the effectiveness of their work. Mentioned scope of work etc.
Hoping I was on the right lines for this one.
Sorry audit committee, not internal audit.
June 9, 2016 at 1:59 am #321268the paper is not that hard. it was ok. but i definitely not ready for Q1 public sector. It took me almost 2 hours to complete it. And when i heard announcement there is remaining 1 hour i become panic. Optional question is not hard. But bcoz im rushing i think i make lot of mess. Q2 is easy with kohlberg and IFAC Code but i totally dont study CDP and cant think logic at all at that time. So i choose Q3 and Q4 which i think a lil bit harder than Q2 but at least i can answer all question.
June 9, 2016 at 3:31 am #321279This exam just made me more confused
If i had studied past exams for seven days that would be enough, i dont think i had done any better when i studied for a whole month ,most question’s requirements were common sense rather than knowledge.hope i have done enough to passJune 9, 2016 at 4:47 am #321288This paper was so weird. there was absolutely no text book knowledge tested as such. It was entirely case based. id say only 20% of notes came up. rest was all case case and case. And the application wasn’t straightforward and it was quite difficult to think of points.
With respect to NED and role of chairman, I said that he did well on strategy as he got involved in understanding the audit programme but wrt scrutiny he failed because although he found that there were reports of theft, he did not mention this in his report to board and did not suggest tightening of controls.
I spent a LOT of time on Q1. 🙁 didnt manage to finish the paper entirely.
Part 1 of Q3 was over-familiriarity and self review (for head of internal audit)
embedding risks was general. i was actually really confused because i wasnt applying a lot of knowledge i had learnt. Whatever was there was in front of me in the case.
lets see now!
June 9, 2016 at 5:30 am #321300The paper was not too difficult to answer, but it was a bit much to complete in the time given.The answers required a bit of thought before putting on paper, but barely had time to think before writing answers. Most of the areas I concentrated on in my studies did not come in the exam. Added to that, it was just my luck that I had excrutiating pain in my right hand, had to stop writing from time to time. Hoping by some miracle to pass.
June 9, 2016 at 8:54 am #321360i did very little preparation. Was planning to even skip the exam. I was surprised to see it wasn’t hard except the time management part. All of it was application of what you already know. Was really happy about the 3E’s and ethical principle being asked.Hope the examiner understands my poor handwriting
June 9, 2016 at 9:58 am #321391For Audit Commitee roles did people use this?
Role and function of an audit committee
? create a climate of discipline and control leading to a reduction of opportunities for fraud
? lend an air of credibility and objectivity in the fnancial statements thereby increasing public
confdence
? assist CFO by providing a forum
? review fnancial statements to improve the quality of reporting
? independent judgement
? strengthen position of the internal auditor
? strengthen position of the external auditor
? assist in the resolution of disputes between external auditor and executive boardThis is what the tutor taught but Im not sure I did this correctly?
June 9, 2016 at 10:00 am #321392I also could not finish the paper time was a major factor, I did not manage to write the statement at all. How many marks was this?? including 4 professional marks I lost. 🙁
June 9, 2016 at 10:21 am #321397vipulv, the statement I guess was 20 or 22 marks, including the 4.
The statement was all blah blah. I guess only few marks on description of transparency and fairness, the rest was pure water, same ideas from point a, b, c.
Such a disappointment.Agree with everybody else, there were very few subjects and models.
PS, I used CLARISSA for roles of audit committee.
Besides that, I wrote that the head was quite incompetent, didn’t have financial expertise, didn’t consider the head of internal auditor’s threats to independence and didn’t review him, just accepting the report.Regarding Head of Internal Auditor, the threats I wrote were:
– Familiarity (10+ years, friendly with everybody, friend at the ware house)
– Self-Interest (in order to preserve the friendships he has, even maybe some financial interest in form of bribe from the warehouse-keeper)
– Self-review (could be present considering 10 years of activity, which could mean that he participated in the design and implementation of some of the internal controls)
– Intimidation (he could have been intimidated, threatened by his old boss at his ex-department, as well as being blackmailed by the warehouse friend in further actions if he had “closed an eye” on the issues present).
– advocacy – mentioned about it, but couldn’t identify any.June 9, 2016 at 10:25 am #321398I agree with what everyone is saying with regards to the examiner not testing a bulk of the key areas that I had focused on most!
I found Q1 difficult, especially the public interest bit. What did everyone put for ways in which stakeholders increase their influence???
June 9, 2016 at 11:23 am #321408@david1988Second part was looking at his role as a NED and effectiveness.
I think the chief of audit committee was a NED…
June 9, 2016 at 1:58 pm #321458@joharper87 said:
I agree with what everyone is saying with regards to the examiner not testing a bulk of the key areas that I had focused on most!I found Q1 difficult, especially the public interest bit. What did everyone put for ways in which stakeholders increase their influence???
Wow I have lost 22 marks already 🙁 I just could not come back to do part D. Poor timing. I spent ages on question 1 and I knew if i carried on doing q1 I would miss out on the two 25 markers so left it. I think I did well on question 2 and 3 was not too difficult to think but overall I do not know as my paper will be out of 78-80 :(.
Plus someone close to me passed away yesterday and I sat exam quite stressful 🙁 🙁 It affected me big time. I tried to focus do you think ACCA could be bit soft on me for this reason? I could provide evidence.
June 9, 2016 at 2:15 pm #321463@joharper87 said:
I agree with what everyone is saying with regards to the examiner not testing a bulk of the key areas that I had focused on most!I found Q1 difficult, especially the public interest bit. What did everyone put for ways in which stakeholders increase their influence???
This is what I put for the 4 marker and 10 marker. Be interested if others felt the same.
Ways to increase influence:
1. Approach local, national press – “People kicked out of homes just so scientists can have a better view” is a story that might sell.
2. Lobby local government. These are elected and if they p*** too many people off they will be voted out.Is development in public interest?
Pro:
1. Job creation – 500 jobs pretty self explanatory
2. Regenerate area – towns which look nice and have a good university/ science scene attract a lot of tourists – more business and prosperity in area.
3. Education – School visits, ties with university could encourage kids to like science giving them more prospects in the future.
Cons:
1. Income inequality
It’s possible that the jobs will go to outsiders who just turn up for work in their nice cars and disappear at 5pm without using local business/ facilities. Possibility of no prospects for the local socially housed tenants. Possibility of a “town vs gown” culture developing
2. The opportunity cost of library
3. The eviction of local residents.
Then need a conclusion – I went for pro.June 9, 2016 at 2:31 pm #321465Ways of increasing the influence:
1. Sue the Local Government. Even if they do not win the case, it will delay the demolition.
2. Refuse to leave the premises.
3. Increase to public sensibility, via press, TV, media.Not sure if this is what the examiner actually wants to hear from us.
Regarding the Mendelow, what did you write? how did you categories the stakeholders?
Mine was:
– Government / Shareholder – High Power / High Interest
– Public Library Potential Users – Low Power / Low Interest
– Tenants of the social housing – Low Power / High Interest.Can anyone confirm / infirm it?
June 9, 2016 at 2:38 pm #321467Hi
Yes indeed ,the time was hard to be managed,let’s see the result!anyhow i must say that P1was beautiful and interesting ,and thanks to opentuition for lectures and advices !
Just one question i have:I see that in companies there are functions like revenue assurance which are more or less part of controls and risk , but i did not see them mentioned at all in the syllabys.June 9, 2016 at 3:05 pm #321478@joharper87 said:
I agree with what everyone is saying with regards to the examiner not testing a bulk of the key areas that I had focused on most!I found Q1 difficult, especially the public interest bit. What did everyone put for ways in which stakeholders increase their influence???
I said the following
– Protests
– Voice option (meeting with authorities)
– Go to media (last resort)Thoughts?
June 9, 2016 at 3:08 pm #321481@vipulv said:
For Audit Commitee roles did people use this?Role and function of an audit committee
? create a climate of discipline and control leading to a reduction of opportunities for fraud
? lend an air of credibility and objectivity in the fnancial statements thereby increasing public
confdence
? assist CFO by providing a forum
? review fnancial statements to improve the quality of reporting
? independent judgement
? strengthen position of the internal auditor
? strengthen position of the external auditor
? assist in the resolution of disputes between external auditor and executive boardThis is what the tutor taught but Im not sure I did this correctly?
The question asked for “roles’ of audit committee. What you wrote up there are the benefits of having an audit committee/ The duties (roles) of the audit committee are:
1. Review financial statements
2. Review internal controls
3. Review internal audit
4. Review risk management
5. Relationship with external auditors
6. InvestigationJune 9, 2016 at 3:11 pm #321482@joharper87 said:
I agree with what everyone is saying with regards to the examiner not testing a bulk of the key areas that I had focused on most!I found Q1 difficult, especially the public interest bit. What did everyone put for ways in which stakeholders increase their influence???
Don’t think CLARISSA suits the question.
The question asked for “roles’ of audit committee. What you wrote up there are the benefits of having an audit committee. The duties (roles) of the audit committee are:
1. Review financial statements
2. Review internal controls
3. Review internal audit
4. Review risk management
5. Relationship with external auditors
6. InvestigationJune 9, 2016 at 3:16 pm #321485@brikhysi16 said:
Hi
Yes indeed ,the time was hard to be managed,let’s see the result!anyhow i must say that P1was beautiful and interesting ,and thanks to opentuition for lectures and advices !
Just one question i have:I see that in companies there are functions like revenue assurance which are more or less part of controls and risk , but i did not see them mentioned at all in the syllabys.3 stakeholders were libary users, housing association and science company providing landscaping
I put them as follows:
Libarary users – High interest, low power (keep informed)
Housing association – High interest, High power (Key player so need to meet and discuss issues ASAP)
Science company – High interest, low power (keep informed)June 9, 2016 at 3:31 pm #321488I found it really difficult to finish in time…I am wondering how users of puplic library could be classified as stakeholders..at Q1?Any answers?
June 9, 2016 at 3:32 pm #321489I think the phrasing of part (ii) was a clue that the residents and library users currently have low power. Here’s what I thought:
Science Company:
High Power:
Can bring 500 jobs to the area or if they don’t like the LGA terms they can go elsewhere.
High Interest:
Hoping to establish a new profitable business operation if terms are rightLocal Residents:
Low Power:
As individuals can’t do a lot. Must obey laws and eventually comply with eviction terms
High Interest:
Would you like to be kicked out your house?Potential Library users:
Low power. Similar to residents. The possibility of creating 10 jobs doesn’t have the same leverage as creating 500.
High Interest:
If things don’t go there way they won’t get their library at all…June 9, 2016 at 3:36 pm #321490@david1988 said:
3 stakeholders were libary users, housing association and science company providing landscapingI put them as follows:
Libarary users – High interest, low power (keep informed)
Housing association – High interest, High power (Key player so need to meet and discuss issues ASAP)
Science company – High interest, low power (keep informed)Do you want to say the Housing association has more power than the Science Company that has as a shareholder the local government?
I would say the power is low, as they have no legal power, but merely a moral one (to not be kicked out of their rented flats).
The Science Company has and the power and the interest. So High / High, I suppose.Regarding Library users, I think you are right. I wrote Low / Low, however, they are interested, though I considered their Interest as insignificant … my bad.
June 9, 2016 at 3:48 pm #321495My second thought was that the library users were not reacted to the development of the project.In fact the leader of the housing association make the allegation that the library users will react because of their interest for the library..
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.