*** P1 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

P1 was an okay paper but required a lot of information to answer the questions.

It was an easy paper actually, very direct questions, but, too lengthy,

For those of u who answered the 4th question, what was the CMD Ethical stance there ??

& for Q2 whoever attempted, in CSR strategy and strategic CSR it was for 10 marks, meaning 5 relevant points… could not get as many points for that questions, answered it, but not to the full..

I read the technical articles but i just could get 3-4 points on that…

I wrote that the moral responce was post conventional as the manger responded what was ethically right and doesn’t follow the orders and intrustions even breached her employment contract…

A better paper for me. Hopefully the results will reflect this.

I did the same post conventional. Very lengthy paper felt extremely rushed not enough time just to think what to write and how to write it lol. Probably failed this paper

@boringaccountant said:
It was an easy paper actually, very direct questions, but, too lengthy,

For those of u who answered the 4th question, what was the CMD Ethical stance there ??

& for Q2 whoever attempted, in CSR strategy and strategic CSR it was for 10 marks, meaning 5 relevant points… could not get as many points for that questions, answered it, but not to the full..

I read the technical articles but i just could get 3-4 points on that…

post conventional i reckon

@shimmer23 said:
Could have been an ‘Okay’ paper had I been better prepared but still I found that it was very much lengthy! :/

For CMD I analysed Conventional as it was about howthe society would perceive it would be (if I got this right) What about you @Bill the butcher?

Anyway! I know it’s a definite resit for me in September. First Level 3 Paper and it was definitely not a good one! 🙁
This paper definitely served me a lifelong lesson!

no if it was conventional she would had followed norms principles and values of her ‘work place’ i.e she wouldnt had told the newspaper or whatever it was BUT since she did NOT keep mum about what was happening, post conventional cmd was being demonstrated as she viewed the dilemma from universally accepted ethical and personally developed ethical guidelines , but that is just my answer

I felt like I repeated myself a lot on this paper, putting the same things in a number of answers to different questions

Questions weren’t too bad… but I found a lot of it required using the scenario and common sense to answer, they were asking for a lot of marks in areas where the knowledge just wouldn’t have filled the answer. Time pressured too… but that’s my fault for overrunning trying to get the professional marks in Q1! Hope everyone did ok 🙂

I found the paper quite good. It was long, I’m happy I was so anal about time management as I only just finished.

For a magazine article I wrote something like:

Lysus – A failure of corporate governance.

Most of our readers will be very familiar with the recent scandal at Lysus. The company is owned and managed by the Mara family…….. (brief summary of what happened).

The question now is, what can we learn from Lysus and how can we prevent such failures in the future?

Then I addressed bi) and bii)

Conclusion.
Lysus is undoubtedly a failure of corporate governance and risk management and there are lessons we can learn from its failure to ensure safety for patients and continuity of our corporations.

does anyone felt that there were repetitive arguments in relation to separation of roles (chair/ceo) in question one section a and d

I worked with post conventional :s