• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Operating NPV

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Operating NPV

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 21, 2017 at 9:16 pm #373566
    lukefitzpatrick95
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    A company has an option to take three annual operating leases which require $375,000 to be paid on 1 January for each year of the project.

    31st Dec year end and pays corporation tax 20 % one year after the relevant year end

    post tax cost of capital is 11 %

    The question asks you to work out the NPV of the cash flows associated with the operating leases.

    I can’t get my head around the first bit of the workings which is:

    $375,000 x 2.44 x 1.11

    why is the 2.444 annuity rate multiplied by the cost of capital?

    February 22, 2017 at 9:56 am #373632
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The annuity factor would assume that the first flow was in 1 years time.

    Here the flows are in advance and so the first flow will be at time 0.

    So our answer has used the 3 year annuity factor (as though it was from time 1 to 3), but because it is actually from time 0 to 2 they have effectively discounted by 1 year too many and to they are multiplying by 1.11 to account for it.

    The alternative was (which I think is more obvious) is to say that the flows are from time 0 to time 2. The flow at time 0 has a discount factor of 1 (the PV is the same as the flow). For the flows from time 1 to time 2 use the 2 year annuity factor.
    Multiplying therefore by 1 + 2 yr annuity factor will give the same answer (there will be rounding differences, but there are irrelevant in the exam)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Operating NPV’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in