• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Okan Co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Okan Co

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 29, 2023 at 7:01 pm #690913
    james8500
    Participant
    • Topics: 68
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆☆

    Hi

    Re Okan Co

    1. Calculation working capital is not presented incrementally, it is 15% of the increase in sales revenue. The solution uses figures based on 15% of the increase in sales but does not deduct the working capital already invested.

    I used incremental figures, is this acceptable?

    2. The project is due to start in 6 months time, with an annual inflation rate of 10% on sales and 4% on costs. I took 50% of the inflation rate (5%) and applied it to the year 1 figures, however the solution uses the annual rates.

    Do we always gross up the year one figures given in the scenario with the inflation rate?

    3. In the professional exam, does the own figure rule apply, if so how much does it apply?

    For example, making a mistake in an NPV calc which skews the NPV significantly from a positive to a negative outcome and using that figure in an APV calculation, which effectively results in a substantial difference in the APV figure. Additionally, using the incorrect figures in the discussion parts of the question.

    Are we losing all the mark because of minor mistakes made earlier?

    Thanks

    August 30, 2023 at 8:48 am #690951
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54675
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1. It is incremental because it is not 15% of the sales revenue but is 15% of the increase in the sales revenue. Had it been 15% of the sales revenue that we would have needed to subtract the WC already invested. The examiners answer is correct and doing different would have lost marks.

    2. The project starts in 6 months time and this is time 0. The costs and revenue given in the question are given as being the amounts in 6 months time and so inflation is per year from then on.

    3. The own figure rules applies in all ACCA exams. You do not lose marks twice for the same mistake (whether the mistake was minor or major).

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • acowtant on Changes in group structure – examples – ACCA SBR lectures
  • Angelacn222 on MA Chapter 26 Questions Variance Analysis
  • Samantha96 on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part a) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Ejueyitsi-Toju on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Goodness on Accruals and Prepayments (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in