Skip to contentSkip to search

Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR

OCI

Dd24512y ago
Q JUNE 2012 SOFP assets INvestment in Hail 55. (i) On 1 June 2010, Robby acquired 80% of the equity interests of Hail. The purchase consideration comprised cash of $50 million. Robby has treated the investment in Hail at fair value through other comprehensive income (OCI). A dividend received from Hail on 1 January 2012 of $2 million has similarly been credited to OCI. It is Robby’s policy to measure the non-controlling interest at fair value and this was $15 million on 1 June 2010. On 1 June 2010, the fair value of the identifiable net assets of Hail were $60 million and the retained earnings of Hail were $16 million. The excess of the fair value of the net assets is due to an increase in the value of non-depreciable WORKING Hail $m Fair value of consideration for 80% interest 50·00 Fair value of non-controlling interest 15·00 Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired (60·00) –––––– Goodwill 5·00 On consolidation, there will be a reversal of the fair value adjustments to the investment held at fair value through profit and LOSS. Therefore the adjustments required are: Dr Other comprehensive income 5·00 Cr Investment in Hail 5·00 I have copied the solution above .I dont understand Y there is a reversal of fair value adjustment ,secondly when investment was kept on OCI then the change in Fairvalue should also be recoreded there .but in solution it has been deducted.
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor12y ago#1
Isn't it because the acquisition of Hall should follow IFRS 3 Business Combinations and not IFRS 9 Financial Instruments?
Dd24512y ago#2
U meant if any investment held at FAIR VALUE THROUGH OCI turn into ASSOCIATE OR SUBSIDARY would hv to be classified as FV THROUGH P/L.
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor12y ago#3
"Fair value through OCI" is an irrevocable election. What I''m saying is that the acquisition of an 80% shareholding by one company of another does not fall under the umbrella of IFRS 9 - it's an IFRS 3 issue
Sign into reply to this topic.