• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

NPV and Perpetuity question

Forums › Ask CIMA Tutor Forums › Ask CIMA P2 Tutor Forums › NPV and Perpetuity question

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Cath.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 1, 2018 at 5:06 pm #434441
    fasnaf
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Greetings of the day,
    I have come across a question that i dont know to solve. Hope you will help.
    Regards,
    Fasna.

    A vehicle distributor has the opportunity to buy some land on which to park vehicles that are awaiting delivery. The land would cost $1 million.

    The benefits of this opportunity would be net positive cash inflows of $100,000 in year 1, $200,000 in year 2 and $250,000 every year in perpetuity from year 3 onwards.

    The vehicle distributor’s cost of capital is 10%.

    What, to the nearest thousand dollars, is the net present value of this opportunity?

    how do you answer this?

    February 5, 2018 at 11:09 am #435227
    Cath
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 447
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi

    Ok so Im assuming you are happy with the first cashflows

    yr 0 1million outflow x 1 = (1,000,000)
    y1 100,000 inflow x 0.909 = 90900
    y2 200,000 inflow x 0.826= 165200

    The final bit the perpetuity from year 3 onwards.. will be added to the above.
    Perpetuity would be calculated as 250,000/0.1 = $2,500,000
    But this assumes there will be a receipt in year 1 and year 2 – if this isn’t the cas we need to deduct the present value of year 1 and 2 receipts from the total present value of the perpetuity

    $ 2,500,000
    less
    yr1 no receipt 250,000 x 0.909 = (227,250)
    y2 no receipt 250,000 x 0.826 = (206,500)

    The value of the perpetuity will be $2,066,250

    Add this to the NPV set out above should come to

    yr 0 1million outflow x 1 = (1,000,000)
    y1 100,000 inflow x 0.909 = 90900
    y2 200,000 inflow x 0.826= 165200
    yr 3 onwards 250k delayed perpetuity = 2,066,250

    NPV will be $1,322,350

    Hope that explains ok
    Kind Regards
    Cath

    July 4, 2019 at 8:36 pm #521890
    oportjunik
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hello,

    I have very good working experience of using financial calculator when performing NPV, IRR and other TVM calculations.

    What I have noticed is that sometimes results of using calculator vs. doing calculations manually do produce slightly different results.

    Do you think that examiner will scope questions in such a way that using financial calculator could produce results which will not mach results examiner is expecting?

    Can I use finical calculator for my TVM questions?

    July 24, 2019 at 10:26 pm #524845
    Cath
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 447
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi there – good question & I understand what you mean.
    However, remember for a CIMA exam – there are restrictions on the type of calculators you can take in with you – so one that calculates TMV or NPV is probably not permitted… check with the CIMA website for this.
    In terms of the rounding – you can generally use the discount tables provided in the exam ( those factors themselves are rounded – but this is something the exam writers are aware of). Either they will write the questions in a way that rounding can’t cause an error eg by giving you multiple choice options to choose from.
    Alternatively a small range of permissible final value answers will be accepted ( to allow for rounding).
    Hope that helps.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Maede on Professional Ethics – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Ayeshaacca on IFRS 16 Identifying a lease – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 3 – Property Income and Investments – Individuals TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in