Novus

Sir please tel me these things I am still confused:

1) If claimant has suffered loss because of defendant’s negligence, and then afterwards because of the ACT OF CLAIMANT loss has increased then would defendant be liable for the loss caused BEFORE intervening act and would he have to pay damages to the claimant because of his negligence?

2) If claimant has suffered loss because of defendant’s negligence, and then afterwards because of the ACT OF THIRD PARTY loss has increased then would defendant be liable for the loss caused BEFORE intervening act and would he have to pay damages to the claimant because of his negligence?

3) If claimant has suffered loss because of defendant’s negligence, and then afterwards because of the NATURAL EVENT loss has increased then would defendant be liable for the loss caused BEFORE intervening act and would he have to pay damages to the claimant because of his negligence?