- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 months ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
PQ Awards Nominations
Please help us to win one of the PQ Magazine awards and send in the voting form >>
You can nominate us in any or all of the following categories: Online College of the Year, Study Resource of the Year, Private Sector Lecturer of the Year, and Accountancy Personality of the Year.
Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>
In Nehby, they have used SFA framework, if I use SFA as for heading but provided enough points in different sections let’s say a Feasibility reason in the Suitability part, will I be awarded full marks?
In the marking scheme, they have said 2 marks for a relevant point. I know it would be better to go without headers in such a situation but let us assume the above example.
I don’t really understand your question. However, if you can identify a suitable and helpful framework, like SFA, then use it: frameworks should help you and they will help the market.
So have major headings for each of SFA, then follow each with your well-explained points ensuring a new paragraph for each. There points do not need headings because they should be self-explanatory.