• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Merger and Acquisition valuations

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Merger and Acquisition valuations

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by njivan28.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 23, 2019 at 12:04 pm #547125
    njivan28
    Participant
    • Topics: 35
    • Replies: 42
    • ☆☆

    Dear Sir.

    When we discuss the value of the firm in this section, we are referring to the value of the firm’s equity; that is, that part of the cash flows generated by the firm’s assets that accrue to the firm’s shareholders.
    Recall the following:  
    VA = value of firm A (acquiring firm); VB = value of firm B (the target firm);
    and VAB = value of the combined firm
    The M&A should only proceed if VAB > VA + VB (there must be synergy!)
    ?V = VAB – (VA + VB),
    where: ?V = incremental net gain from the M&A (i.e. synergy)
    We can now define:
    = the value of Firm B to Firm A in an M&A.
    V*B = VB + ?V
    V*B NPV (M&A) = V*B – Cost to Firm A of the acquisition….i understand all the above,except the last point,when they say “we can now define”,the V*B part,it does not make sense to ma after the above explanation,please help,thank you.

    September 23, 2019 at 3:03 pm #547142
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I don’t know where you have copied all this from, but for them to have written it all out in symbols like that is a bit silly as far as the AFM exam is concerned 🙂

    What the last line means is that the benefit to the shareholders of company A is the value of company B to company A (i.e. V*B) less the cost to company A of the acquisition (although that isn’t obvious from the equation as they have written it).

    September 23, 2019 at 5:02 pm #547157
    njivan28
    Participant
    • Topics: 35
    • Replies: 42
    • ☆☆

    Yes sir,what confuses me is that the value of V*B itself.how on earth they get that mathematically,when the change(V is the differnce of the VA +VB),and suddenly we say V*B is the sumt of VandV*B,my thought process is that it should be V-VA.Thank you, i know get the implication by the last statemen(Comapny A value)t,but i don’t get the way around V*B.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 4 Questions Environmental Management Accounting
  • singhjyoti on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in