MECKERAL BBP Q55

This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by dolphinslover.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Author

Posts
November 29, 2019 at 2:35 pm #554146
dolphinslover
Member
- Topics: 26
- Replies: 15
Dear Sir,

hope you well..

Kindly assist me in understanding the answer derived.

Evaluate the APV project using metrics and methods for decision-making under risk and uncertainty. and assess the suitability of the different methods used.

VC = 47972
increases at 19%

I understand package 1
500 750 1000
1 4557340 6836010 9114680
2
3
I am not understanding how to go about package 2 and 3 please assist how to go about the answer ?

its urgent.

Thanks
November 29, 2019 at 5:24 pm #554170
Ken Garrett
Keymaster
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 10660
Is it not all set out in Appendix 2 of the answer? Which figures are causing a problem?
November 30, 2019 at 7:43 am #554218
dolphinslover
Member
- Topics: 26
- Replies: 15
How did they get :

Package 2 : 3,307,340 5,586,010 7,864,680

Package 3 : 2057340 4,336,010 6,614,680
November 30, 2019 at 7:44 am #554219
dolphinslover
Member
- Topics: 26
- Replies: 15
I am not understanding how they derived the answers for package 2 and 3
November 30, 2019 at 9:24 am #554234
Ken Garrett
Keymaster
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 10660
3,307,340 is the difference between

Revenue: 36,043,340 and total costs of 32,736,000 etc.

See Appendix 2 at the end of the answer.
November 30, 2019 at 7:18 pm #554277
dolphinslover
Member
- Topics: 26
- Replies: 15
Got it, thanks so much
Author

Posts

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

The topic ‘MECKERAL BBP Q55’ is closed to new replies.