• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

MC question

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › MC question

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 29, 2015 at 9:19 am #292914
    jefftheman2
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    Hi This might be an F2 question- but I found it in a F5 book.

    The principal budget factor for Product Z is material A. The company warehouse holds the total supply of material A required for the next month’s planned production of Product Z and no further supplies will be available. No inventory of Product Z is carried.

    A flood in one corner of the warehouse has destroyed 64 kg of material A.

    The standard cost card from Product Z is as follows:

    $
    Selling price 235
    Material A (8 kg @ $6 per kg) 48
    Labour (6 hours @ $9 per hour) 54
    Variable overhead (6 hours @ $7 per hour) 42
    Fixed overhead (6 hours @ $5 per hour) 30

    What is the cost to the company as a result of the flood’s destruction of material A?

    If 64kgs of Material A has been lost, then we have lost 64kg/8kg = 8units?

    So loss in contribution- sales-vc
    Sales=$235*8 units=1880

    VC=8 units(48+54+42)=1152

    Contribution= 1880-1152
    =28
    The answer is 1,112. The soultion did not include material in the VC calculation. But why? Material is also a VC and contributes to calculating contribution right? why has the answer only factored in labour and Variable overhead?

    Thanks

    December 29, 2015 at 4:32 pm #292944
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54829
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The material have already been purchased and the money spent – so this is a sunk cost and is not relevant.

    What is relevant is that if they are unable to produce X then they lose the revenue of $235 per unit, but they will save by not having to pay the labour of $54 per unit and by not having to pay the variable overheads of $42 per unit. So the net loss is 235 – 54 – 42 = 139 per unit.
    They will lose production of 8 units (64kg/8kg) and so the total relevant cost = 8 x 139 = 1,112

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on The cost of capital – Cost of debt – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Process Costing (part 1) – Normal or Expected Losses – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • John Moffat on Group Accounts The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (1b) – ACCA (FA) lectures
  • prathikr on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in