• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Material yield variance

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Material yield variance

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 25, 2020 at 5:17 pm #581977
    espie
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    John,

    I am confused between two past exam questions: Kappa Co (Sep 2018) and Crumbly Cakes (June 2009).

    I fully understand crumbly cakes approach but I don’t get the correct answer for yield variance when I use the same principle for Kappa.

    To calculate the total yield variance for Kappa, I assumed 4600 is the actual output after material loss of 20%. Therefore the standard input (ie standard quantity at standard mix) would be: 4600*100/80 = 5750. Instead answer is 5520.
    Is it because there is no material loss in Kappa? Although the question clearly says there is material loss – standard input is 120 kg and output is 100 kg.

    Please help.
    Many thanks!

    August 25, 2020 at 7:17 pm #581989
    espie
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    I think I know where I went wrong – didn’t read the Kappa question carefully and mixed up the input kgs and the 100kg of Omega. From the way I understand now, there is no material waste. Standard input in total is 120 kgs per unit and ‘100 kg of Omega’ is to be treated as 1 unit like it would be in any other standard question.
    Is that correct?

    August 26, 2020 at 8:55 am #582041
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes, that is correct 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Material yield variance’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Breadtoast67 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • adatya on Auditors’ Rights, Appointment, Removal, Resignation and Regulation – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • John Moffat on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • RuthlynE on FM Chapter 11 Questions – Sources of finance – equity
  • AllisonHoang on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in