• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Material yield variance

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Material yield variance

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 25, 2020 at 5:17 pm #581977
    espie
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 12
    • ☆

    John,

    I am confused between two past exam questions: Kappa Co (Sep 2018) and Crumbly Cakes (June 2009).

    I fully understand crumbly cakes approach but I don’t get the correct answer for yield variance when I use the same principle for Kappa.

    To calculate the total yield variance for Kappa, I assumed 4600 is the actual output after material loss of 20%. Therefore the standard input (ie standard quantity at standard mix) would be: 4600*100/80 = 5750. Instead answer is 5520.
    Is it because there is no material loss in Kappa? Although the question clearly says there is material loss – standard input is 120 kg and output is 100 kg.

    Please help.
    Many thanks!

    August 25, 2020 at 7:17 pm #581989
    espie
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 12
    • ☆

    I think I know where I went wrong – didn’t read the Kappa question carefully and mixed up the input kgs and the 100kg of Omega. From the way I understand now, there is no material waste. Standard input in total is 120 kgs per unit and ‘100 kg of Omega’ is to be treated as 1 unit like it would be in any other standard question.
    Is that correct?

    August 26, 2020 at 8:55 am #582041
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54704
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes, that is correct 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Material yield variance’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • verweijlisa on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • John Moffat on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)
  • Salexy on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in