• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Material usage variances without weight

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Material usage variances without weight

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 29, 2017 at 2:50 pm #408999
    mincedump
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi, first time user.

    I am wondering whether I have calculated this correctly for the material usage variance.

    Standard material cost for the year: 4Mil
    Actual cost: 3.696Mil
    Budgeted sales: 40000
    Actual Sales: 32000

    Standard material cost for the year: 4Mil / Budgeted sales: 40000 = standard cost / unit £100

    Actual cost: 3.696Mil / Actual Sales: 32000 = actual Material price/ unit 115.5 pound

    Usage Variance=

    Actual cost: 3.696Mil – ( standard cost / unit £100 * Actual Sales: 32000)

    = £496000

    Thanks

    September 30, 2017 at 10:58 am #409060
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54662
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No, it is not correct – it is impossible to calculate the material usage variance from the information given here, and could not possibly be asked in the exam unless more information was provided.

    4M is the standard cost of the material used during the year (not the budgeted figure) and therefore the materials price/expenditure variance is 4M – 3.696M = 0.304M favourable.

    It is impossible to calculate the usage variance without knowing the actual production (which will only be equal to the actual sales if there is no change in inventory) and without knowing the standard usage per unit and the actual total usage of material.

    I do suggest that you watch my free lectures on variances (the lectures are a complete free course for Paper F2 and cover everything needed to be able to pass the exam well).
    You should also buy a Revision Kit from one of the ACCA approved publishers, because the questions there are all of exam-standard.

    September 30, 2017 at 3:56 pm #409080
    mincedump
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    Thank you for the reply. I have overlooked some of my figures. Below is the question I am stuck with, I have tried to work through the notes but struggle to find anything similar to this. I have been asked to calculate the labour time and efficiency variance, the material usage variance, the fixed O/H volume and expenditure variance, the variable o/h expenditure and efficiency variance and the admin volume and expenditure variance. I have calculated all of the overhead variances correctly using your notes. But I am struggling with the labor and material variances.

    Anderson Ltd. manufacture gearboxes for use in cars. At the start of the
    year, the management of Anderson Ltd. estimated that its costs would be:
    This was based on the following:
    80 employees
    2000 hours worked by each employee
    40 000 gearboxes manufactured in the year as budgeted production
    £200 unit selling price.

    % of sales value
    Direct labour 8
    Direct material 50
    Variable production overhead 8
    Fixed production overhead 12
    Administration overhead 5

    You have recently been employed by the company to establish a standard
    costing system. At the end of the year you were able to extract the
    following information:
    • labour costs £4.40/hour
    • 32 000 units sold
    • £210/unit selling price
    • 160 000 hours were worked
    • variable production overheads were £640 000
    • fixed production overheads were £810 000
    • administration costs were £350 000
    • raw material prices were 10% higher than expected
    • total expenditure on raw material was £3.696 M
    • there were no opening or closing stocks of raw materials.

    Budgeted Cost
    unit cost
    £ £
    Direct labour £16
    Direct materials £100
    Variable overhead £16
    Fixed overhead £24
    £156

    Admin overhead £10

    Total £166

    Selling price £200.00
    Standard Profit / unit £34.00

    Budgeted Profit £1,360,000.00

    Sales Price Variance £320,000.0 F
    Sales Quantity Variance -1,680,000.0 A

    Standard Cost £640,000
    Actual Cost £640,000

    Expenditure Variance 0.0

    Efficiency Variance 0.0

    Fixed overheads

    Expenditure Variance -£150,000.0

    Volume Variance -£192,000.0

    Admin Overhead

    Expenditure Variance -£50,000.0

    Volume Variance -£80,000.0

    If you could point me in the right direction that would be great.

    Thank you

    October 1, 2017 at 9:01 am #409122
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54662
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Unless you have been set this as a test question (and we are not here to answer test questions!) then I can’t understand why you are attempting a question for which you do not have an answer.
    Again, you should be using a Revision Kit from one of the ACCA approved publishers – they have answers and workings for all the questions. You should ask about whatever it is in the answer that you are unclear about, and then I will help.

    For labour, the standard cost per unit is $16. The standard hours per unit (using budgeted figures) are (80 x 2,000) / 40,000 = 4 hours.
    Therefore the standard labour rate = $16/4 = $4 per hour.

    You know what the actual production was (32,000 units); the actual hours worked (160,000 hours) and the actual labour rate ($4.40 per hour) and so now you can calculate the labour variances using the standard rules that I work through in my free lectures.

    For materials, the actual expenditure is $3.696M. Since this is 10% more than expected (so is 110% of the standard cost), the expenditure should have been 100/110 x $3.696M = $3.36M. Therefore the expenditure variance is 3.696 – 3.36 = $0.336M adverse.

    For the actual production of 32,000 units, the standard cost should have been 32,000 x $100 = $3.2M. Since the actual standard cost was in total $3.36M (as shown above), the usage variance must be $3.36M – $3.2M = $0.16M adverse.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Material usage variances without weight’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nashra30 on CIMA E1 Chapter 3 Test
  • azubair on Financial Performance Measurement – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • j.akshaya on Group SFP – Example (Basic consolidation) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • rishitxx on ACCA BT Chapter 1 – The nature and structure of organisations – Questions
  • singhjyoti on Basic group structures – SPLOCI introduction and example – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in