- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by .
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
- The topic ‘Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing’ is closed to new replies.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › FIA Forums › Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing
A company, which manufactures and sells a single product, has the following sales and production data for a period:
Production 2,200 units
Sales 2,000 units
Contribution per unit is $5.
Fixed overheads per unit are $10.
What is the value of the absorption and marginal costing profits for the business?
Absorption costing profit:
$10,000
$11,200
$11,500
$12,000
Marginal costing profit
$10,000
$11,200
$11,500
$12,000
Answer is Absorption costing 12000 and Marginal costing 10000.
How would it show profit in marginal is contribution is less than fixed overhead?
Have you copied the question correctly?
Yes sir.
I have changed a bit like answers were given in tabular form and we were asked to tick. I wrote that table in bullets.
But if 2000 units are sold, the contribution is 2000 x 5 = 10,000. To get profit, fixed costs have to be deducted, I assume amounting to 2200 x 10 = 22,000 (though fixed costs should be absorbed on budgeted output, not actual output). That suggests a loss of 12,000.
I don’t really understand.
Right sir. May be it is problem with answer. Can you please suggest me the correct answer?
I thinkmthe MC result is a loss of 12,000 and the TAC result is a loss of 10,000 because there are 200 items in closing stock each having 10 of fixed overhead = 2000 overhead carried forward in inventory under TAC. In MC all overheads are written off in the period.
Thank you sir.
