- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
The following statements set out to explain why the profit for a period calculated under marginal costing may be greater than the profit calculated under absorption costing. Are they true or false?
1.Fixed production overhead is over-absorbed
2.Sales volume is less than production volume
Statement 1 is false because fpoh has no relation to marginal costing, 2nd statement is also false because if sales volume is less than production then in either costing profit will decrease.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.