• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

marginal and absorption costing

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › marginal and absorption costing

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 2, 2015 at 11:24 am #259333
    Avatarstan92
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    You have calculated marginal profit as $200000, and absorption proit $180000. Overhead absorption of $4000. Actual production is 5000 units . What is the unit sold?

    July 2, 2015 at 6:03 pm #259357
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Please do not simply set me test questions!!

    You must have an answer in the same book as you found the question, and this forum is for you to ask about things you don’t understand – not to simply demand answers.

    Also, do check you have copied the question correctly, because as you will see the answer is a bit extreme.

    If 4,000 overheads were absorbed it means that the absorption rate is 4000/5000 = $0.80 per unit.

    The difference between marginal and absorption profits is the change in inventory x absorption rate. So the change in inventory is 20,000 / 0.80 = 25,000 units.

    Because marginal profit is higher than absorption it means that the inventory must have fallen, so the sales must have been 25,000 more than the production and were therefore 30,000 units.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • tomikacharles1986 on Depreciation Introduction – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • CartelAwper on ACCA BT Chapter 3 – An organisation’s stakeholders – Questions
  • Colossus on Presentation of financial statements – Example 1 (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Jay15 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Inflation (example 5) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • oabilentatiwa on Process Technology and Quality control – CIMA E1

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in