Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA MA Management Accounting Forums › Marginal & absorption costing
- This topic has 9 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- January 1, 2015 at 3:35 am #221854
please help the below question :
A company sells a single product at a price of $14/unit.
Variable manufacturing costs of the product are $6.40/unit.
Fixed manufacturing overheads, which are absorbed into the cost of production at a unit rate ( based on normal activity of 20,000 units per period), are $92,000 / period.
any over or under absorbed fixed manufacturing overheads balances are transferred to the profit and loss account at the end of each period, in order to establish the manufacturing profit.sales and production (in units) for two periods are as follows :
period 1
sales – 15,000 & production 18,000
period 2
sales – 22,000 & production 21,000The manufacturing profit in period 1 was reported as $35,800
What was the manufacturing profit for period 2 using absorption costing & marginal costing?
the answer for AC is 70,600 & MC is 75,200January 1, 2015 at 6:12 pm #221871There are several ways of getting the answer to this question – here is one way!!
The contribution per unit is 14 – 6.40 = 7.60.
So the total contribution is 22,000 x 7.60 = 167200
So the marginal costing profit is 167200 – 92000 = 75200.The absorption rate is 92,000/20,000 = 4.60 per unit.
The inventory fell by 1000 units.
So the absorption costing profit is 75200 – (1000 x 4.60) = 70600March 13, 2015 at 5:33 pm #232294kindly explain where the 22000 units came from I can’t locate it from the question
January 29, 2017 at 10:53 am #370123Please help the question below;
From the following data for a company which started operation at the beginning of the year, discuss the contention that “marginal costing rewards sales whereas absorption costing rewards production”.January February March
Sales 6,000 7,500 5,000
Production 8,000 7,000 16,0001. Selling price = $120 per unit
2. Production cost per unit
Direct materials $30
Direct labor $20
Variable overheads $15
Fixed overhead $25 (this is based on an estimated normal level of 22,500 units per quarter)January 29, 2017 at 5:55 pm #370167@abobo96
I don’t think this is a practice kit question, it seems more of a study text example to me. It requires you to compare profits from both the costing methods, for which you’ll have to make separate income statements using both the costing techniques. This is a lengthy procedure and cannot be done completely here. So, i’ll do it in as simple way as possible.Profit Using Marginal Costing:
For January:
Contribution = SP – Marginal Cost = 120 – (30+20+15)
Contribution = 55 (per unit sold)Profit = Total Contribution – Fixed Costs
Profit = 55×6000 – 25x(22500/3) = 330,000 – 25×7500
Profit = 330,000 – 187,500
Profit = 142,500Profit using Absorption Costing for January:
Inventory Levels increase by 2,000. So,Abs. Profit = 142,500 + 25×2000 = 142,500 + 50000
Abs. Profit = 192,500Absorption Costing results in profit being greater than Marginal Costing due to the fact that production is greater than sales. Meaning that the unsold units have carried some part of fixed costs with them in their valuation, resulting in expenses being less than marginal costing and hence profit being higher.
For February using Marginal Costing:
Profit = 55 x 7,500 – 187,500 = 412,500 – 187,500
Profit = 225,000Profit using Absorption Costing:
Closing Inventory = 2,000 (opening) + 7,000(prod.) – 7,500 (sold)
Closing Inventory = 1,500
Inventory decreases by 500 (2,000-1,500)Abs. Profit = 225,000 – 12,500(25×500)
Abs. Profit = 212,500Absorption Costing results in lower profit than Marginal Costing due to the fact that the opening inventory of 2,000 carried that Fixed Cost which was not deducted in January. This Fixed Cost increased the total expenses for the period and hence a lower profit. While in Marginal Costing, the same amount of 187,500 was deducted.
We can summarize that Absorption Costing results in Higher Profits when Production is greater than Sales (as in January) and Lower Profits when Production is lower than Sales (as in February). While the opposite is happening with Marginal Costing i.e Profits are lower when Sales<Production (in Jan) and higher when Sales>Production (in Feb).
I really, really want Sir @johnmoffat to improvise this answer. Cause i don’t think i can answer you the way he does, plus i want him to correct me if i’m wrong or having any lacking in my analysis.
February 5, 2017 at 9:10 am #371120Thank you for the answer!
February 5, 2017 at 12:50 pm #371160@abobo96 said:
Thank you for the answer!You are welcome 🙂
February 7, 2017 at 7:14 am #371113please help, Dexter Company produces and sells a single product, a wooden hand loom for weaving small items such as scarves. Selected cost and operating data relationg to the product for two years are given below:
Selling price per unit 50
Manufacturing costs:
Variable per unit produced:
Direct materials 11
Direct labour 6
Variable overhead 3
Fixed per year 120,000
Selling and administrative costs:
Variable per unit sold 5
Fixed per year 70,000Year 1 Year 2
Units in beginning inventory 0 2,000
Units produced during the year 10,000 6,000
Units sold during the year 8,000 8,000
Units in ending inventory 2,000 01. Assume that the company uses absorption costing
(a) Compute the unit product cost in each year.
(b) Prepare an income statement for each year.2. Assume that the company uses variable costing
(a) Compute the unit product cost in each year
(b) Prepare an income statement for each year.3. Reconcile the variable costing and absorption costing net income figures.
February 7, 2017 at 5:18 pm #371504Given that you must have an answer to this question in the same book in which you found the question, there is no point in asking me to provide an answer as well.
Ask about whatever it is in the printed answer that you do not understand and then I will try and help you!
(I assume of course that you have watched my free lectures. The lectures are a complete course for Paper F2 and cover everything needed to be able to pass the exam well.)
“Variable costing” is not a term used in Paper F2 – the correct term is “Marginal Costing”. I suggest that you use a Revision Kit from one of the ACCA approved publishers – they use the correct terms and have questions that are exam-standard questions.
February 8, 2017 at 10:37 am #371115Please: Dexter Company produces and sells a single product, a wooden hand loom for weaving small items such as scarves. Selected cost and operating data relationg to the product for two years are given below:
Selling price per unit 50
Manufacturing costs:
Variable per unit produced:
Direct materials 11
Direct labour 6
Variable overhead 3
Fixed per year 120,000
Selling and administrative costs:
Variable per unit sold 5
Fixed per year 70,000Year 1 Year 2
Units in beginning inventory 0 2,000
Units produced during the year 10,000 6,000
Units sold during the year 8,000 8,000
Units in ending inventory 2,000 01. Assume that the company uses absorption costing
(a) Compute the unit product cost in each year.
(b) Prepare an income statement for each year.2. Assume that the company uses variable costing
(a) Compute the unit product cost in each year
(b) Prepare an income statement for each year.3. Reconcile the variable costing and absorption costing net income figures.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Marginal & absorption costing’ is closed to new replies.