march/june 2016 Q4

This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author

Posts
June 6, 2017 at 4:13 pm #390930
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 16
- Replies: 38
Dear sir,

How would the answer differ if the expected NPV of the strike price of USD15m had not been 0?
June 6, 2017 at 6:54 pm #391037
John Moffat
Keymaster
- Topics: 57
- Replies: 54859
The current value (the PV of the future flows) would be higher by the amount of the NPV.
Author

Posts

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘march/june 2016 Q4’ is closed to new replies.