Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › March/june 2016 question 4
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- November 14, 2018 at 7:53 pm #484843
Hi My dear tutor, I have a question.
1st
Let us assume Division M buys from outside supplier.
———-Selling price——–96$
Less Supplier cost———(37$)
less own cost—————(30$)
equal profit ————–29$Division L selling outside
Selling price——-40
own cost———–(24)
equal————16$Group
Selling(40+96)=136
less supplier cost-(37)
cost by M–(30)
cost by l—–(24)
equal profit—–45So profit for M 29$+profit l 16$=45$
2nd
Let us assume M buys from internally
Selling price—96
cost———(40)
Variable cost-(30)
equal profit-26Let us assume division L sells externally and internally
External sales-40
internal sales-40
less variable cost-(24)
equal profit-56Group
Selling -136
less variable cost by M-30
variable cost by l—24
interdivisional cost-(40)
equal profit 42why my individual division profit can not equal to group profit in 2nd calculation?
I want to find 3$ extra profit and 17 loss by calculation like that because I will catch it.I want to find the logic behind it.I would like to calculate in the way that you calculation some examples in opentuition.
Need your explanation in depth.this example has been done by your lecture video but you have not showed it like this way.
November 14, 2018 at 8:25 pm #4848562nd
Let us assume M buys from internally
Selling price—96
cost———(40)
Variable cost-(30)
equal profit-26Let us assume division L sells externally and internally
External sales-40
internal sales-20
less variable cost-(24)
equal profit-56Group
Selling -136
less variable cost by M-30
variable cost by l—24
equal profit 82now 56+26=82
I think i made a wrong by subtracting interdivisional cost of 40 $
when i deduct Division M’s profit in first and second case
29$-26$=3$ we can see that division M earned extra 3$ by buying from external supplier.
But when i deduct group profit i both cases i can not get incremental loss 42-45 it will be 37 $November 15, 2018 at 7:36 am #484886You are wrong to deduct ‘interdivisional cost’ – it is a cost to one and revenue to the other, there is no net affect on the group.
I do not understand what you mean in your last line.
November 15, 2018 at 12:22 pm #4848981st
Let us assume Division M buys from outside supplier.
———-Selling price——–96$
Less Supplier cost———(37$)
less own cost—————(30$)
equal profit ————–29$2nd
Let us assume M buys from internally
Selling price—96
cost———(40)
Variable cost-(30)
equal profit-26M earns extra profit if buyr from outside supplier which is 29$-26$=3$
1st
Group profitSelling(40+96)=136
less supplier cost-(37)
cost by M–(30)
cost by l—–(24)
equal profit—–452nd
Group profit
Selling -136
less variable cost by M-30
variable cost by l—24
equal profit 8282-45=37$
In your video lecture, company losses 17 $ per component, then I deduct it group profit from each other, why I can’t get 17$ loss?Hope it is clear now
November 15, 2018 at 4:46 pm #484927You cannot do it the way you are wanting to.
The problem is that the maximum external demand for component L is only 160,000. This is what they are currently selling externally, and even if M buys externally then L won’t sell any more externally.
Check the examiners answer – all that was required is the incremental cost per unit, and there isn’t really any other way of doing it, or anything extra required.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘March/june 2016 question 4’ is closed to new replies.
