• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

March/June 2016 Q1 – Over-Hedge

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › March/June 2016 Q1 – Over-Hedge

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 5, 2018 at 4:36 am #487368
    jayped
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Dear John,

    Extracted from Mar/Jun 2016 answers, Question 1 b ii (Appendix 2):

    Number of contracts bought = $23,121,387/$125,000 = approximately 185 contracts (resulting in a very small over-hedge and therefore not material)

    [Full credit will be given where the calculations are used to show the correction of the over-hedge using forwards]

    Can you please help me to understand what I am missing from the statements above regarding the over-hedge? What is the over-hedge and how do we show the calculation to correct?

    Thank you.

    December 5, 2018 at 4:54 am #487369
    jayped
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Okay, I realise the small over-hedge is (125,000 x 185) – 23,121,387 = $3,613. But how do I show the calculation to correct?

    Thanks,

    December 5, 2018 at 7:31 am #487406
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54829
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    185 contracts would have exactly hedged a € receipt of 185 x 125,000 x 0.8650 = €20,003,125.

    Given that they actually receive only €20M, they have hedged too much and would therefore have to buy €3,125 to complete the deal if they were to avoid risk completely. So they would use the forward rate and convert at $1.1601.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Foreign exchange risk management (1) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • loserian on Foreign exchange risk management (1) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Sakura0817 on ACCA BT Chapter 4 – Organisational culture – Questions
  • DolapoO.J on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in