• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

March/June 2016 Q1 – Over-Hedge

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › March/June 2016 Q1 – Over-Hedge

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 5, 2018 at 4:36 am #487368
    jayped
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Dear John,

    Extracted from Mar/Jun 2016 answers, Question 1 b ii (Appendix 2):

    Number of contracts bought = $23,121,387/$125,000 = approximately 185 contracts (resulting in a very small over-hedge and therefore not material)

    [Full credit will be given where the calculations are used to show the correction of the over-hedge using forwards]

    Can you please help me to understand what I am missing from the statements above regarding the over-hedge? What is the over-hedge and how do we show the calculation to correct?

    Thank you.

    December 5, 2018 at 4:54 am #487369
    jayped
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Okay, I realise the small over-hedge is (125,000 x 185) – 23,121,387 = $3,613. But how do I show the calculation to correct?

    Thanks,

    December 5, 2018 at 7:31 am #487406
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54675
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    185 contracts would have exactly hedged a € receipt of 185 x 125,000 x 0.8650 = €20,003,125.

    Given that they actually receive only €20M, they have hedged too much and would therefore have to buy €3,125 to complete the deal if they were to avoid risk completely. So they would use the forward rate and convert at $1.1601.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Ejueyitsi-Toju on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • sadik.sadka on How to make the best use of OpenTuition
  • SONIC916 on Lessee accounting – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • AkinMike on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AkinMike on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in