• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

*** March 2025 ACCA AFM exam – Instant Poll and comments ***

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › *** March 2025 ACCA AFM exam – Instant Poll and comments ***

  • This topic has 25 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 2 months ago by DeltaThetha.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 26 total)
1 2 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 7, 2025 at 7:00 am #715722
    opentuition_team
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 1380
    • Replies: 1404
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    How was your March 2025 ACCA AFM exam?

    Vote in the Instant Poll


    (Comments will be opened after 5PM UK)

    March 7, 2025 at 3:26 pm #715959
    ivanovrita86
    Participant
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    The acquisition question was hard. It was the topic I was best in when practicing, but was the worst in the exam.

    March 7, 2025 at 3:44 pm #715960
    abd1999
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Exactly. There seemed to be so many pieces of information missing

    March 7, 2025 at 4:46 pm #715962
    Nandakishore
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    The Swap question with 2 counter party was really tricky. Also the Acquisition question was really tough

    March 7, 2025 at 4:48 pm #715963
    Nandakishore
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    True even I got the same question set

    March 7, 2025 at 6:10 pm #715971
    Seetsa
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    It was really difficult to calculate value of combined companies, the number of share issued, the 50 50 share ?? it was supposed to be the easiest section for me

    March 7, 2025 at 6:11 pm #715972
    yusif.aliyuev
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    What did you chooe Counterparrty 1 or 2? and why?

    March 7, 2025 at 6:16 pm #715973
    Seetsa
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Examiner’s report will come out to state that students who prepared and practiced on that area scored well???

    How do you ask a question like that , never seen in previous exams….???

    March 7, 2025 at 6:16 pm #715974
    badajoz
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Went with counterparty 2. 0.5 diff vs 0.1. But to be fair I spent the first hour looking at the screen hoping for a meteor impact

    March 7, 2025 at 6:17 pm #715975
    yusif.aliyuev
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    in NPV case study, for divisiable and no diviaible which project did you choose?

    March 7, 2025 at 6:18 pm #715976
    yusif.aliyuev
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Actually I chose counterparty 2 as well, because C2 benefit was 0.5% and with C1 was 0.1%. SO same lagic. Thanks. But you wrote figures differently so it means figures can be different yes?

    March 7, 2025 at 6:54 pm #715978
    stormrideruk7
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I got selling of shoe division capital reorganisation ifr and npv

    March 7, 2025 at 7:30 pm #715980
    tewelin
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 12
    • ☆

    Swaps, capital rationing, npv, selling division, sofp adjustments

    March 7, 2025 at 8:38 pm #715982
    ivanovrita86
    Participant
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Yes, totally. Nothing about combined company, no share to share details… couldn’t even start. Hope for the rest and the theoretical part of the first question…

    March 7, 2025 at 8:39 pm #715983
    ivanovrita86
    Participant
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Yes… couldn’t even start. Didn’t see anything like this in previous exams.

    March 7, 2025 at 8:57 pm #715984
    ivanovrita86
    Participant
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    So how did you guys calculate the gain to shareholders from share for share exchange? How many shares for how many? And the equity gain in the very first question?

    March 7, 2025 at 10:44 pm #715986
    badajoz
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Yeah but strangely I think the first part of the question was what’s the difference between that and the IRF. I bamboozled them with information because no twat ever asks that in real life

    March 8, 2025 at 1:55 pm #716017
    radhwaan
    Participant
    • Topics: 30
    • Replies: 43
    • ☆☆

    NPV, SOFP adjustment and capital rationing!! This paper was very lengthy and a train wreck to be honest!

    March 8, 2025 at 3:05 pm #716030
    stormrideruk7
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    what did anyone get for the sale of the soft drink division?

    March 8, 2025 at 3:14 pm #716031
    Leannehuynh
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    I can’t remember the exact number but 900 something million. What about you?

    March 8, 2025 at 3:14 pm #716032
    Leannehuynh
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    I can’t remember the exact number but 900 something million. What about you?

    March 8, 2025 at 3:22 pm #716033
    stormrideruk7
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I think 985 pr 965 can’t remember

    March 8, 2025 at 6:29 pm #716041
    tewelin
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 12
    • ☆

    Examiners were very creative with this one

    March 9, 2025 at 6:49 am #716050
    melwyn69
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    The 1st, 2nd & 3rd question of Section A – Acquisition & creation of wealth for shareholders was very tough. The mood was off reading this question itself. Had to jump to Question 2 & 3.

    March 15, 2025 at 12:52 pm #716179
    yusif.aliyuev
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    this number was for calcualtion of NPV for 1-4 years range, did not you include Terminal value for full firm value?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 26 total)
1 2 →
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zainab@24 on The capital asset pricing model (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • hana1992 on Foreign exchange risk management (2) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ISABIRYEZA on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ISABIRYEZA on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in