• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Mar June 2016 Mehran

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › Mar June 2016 Mehran

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by f6ali.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 27, 2016 at 1:54 pm #351881
    kakahh
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 42
    • ☆☆

    Hi, when calculating the FV of farming purpose, the tax credit arises annually.

    So the FV for farming would not be only 5.1,
    but 0.1M x no. of years (although it is not being provided, it must be higher than 5.1)

    And which standard supporting this- ” The fair value is determined from the perspective of a market participant and is not influenced by the Mehran’s decision to discontinue the brand. ”

    Any thoughts on this, thanks.

    June 9, 2020 at 9:09 pm #573314
    misbahkiran
    Participant
    • Topics: 109
    • Replies: 194
    • ☆☆☆

    The fair value is determined from the perspective of a market participant and is not influenced by the Mehran’s decision to discontinue the brand. ”

    can you please elaborate this?

    why we take 17 as fair value?

    June 9, 2020 at 10:07 pm #573318
    misbahkiran
    Participant
    • Topics: 109
    • Replies: 194
    • ☆☆☆

    para 25 of IAS 11

    ” party that participates in, but does not have joint control of, a joint venture shall account for its interest in the arrangement in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, unless it has significant influence over the joint venture, in which case it shall account for it in accordance with IAS 28 (as amended in 2011)”

    question 1

    my question is when When hold controlling interest as a result of preference share will we account for it in accordance with IAS 28?

    June 10, 2020 at 1:57 pm #573374
    f6ali
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 342
    • ☆☆☆

    @misbahkiran said:
    para 25 of IAS 11

    ” party that participates in, but does not have joint control of, a joint venture shall account for its interest in the arrangement in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, unless it has significant influence over the joint venture, in which case it shall account for it in accordance with IAS 28 (as amended in 2011)”

    question 1

    my question is when When hold controlling interest as a result of preference share will we account for it in accordance with IAS 28?

    1. Financial statements are always prepared using ‘substance over form’ concept. We always analyse the economic substance of transactions and arrangements in order to determine their accounting treatment. Therefore, if an investor, based on investment in preference shares, can impact the operating and financial decisions of the investee, we will consider the treatment similar to that of ordinary shareholding.

    2. It is possible that voting rights are attached with preference shares, however obtaining controlling interest using them is unlikely. If investor has significant influence or joint control based on preference shares, we will still treat the investment using ‘equity accounting’ under IAS 28. Similarly, if the investor has control over investee, the treatment will be that under IFRS 3.

    June 10, 2020 at 4:22 pm #573388
    misbahkiran
    Participant
    • Topics: 109
    • Replies: 194
    • ☆☆☆

    @misbahkiran said:
    The fair value is determined from the perspective of a market participant and is not influenced by the Mehran’s decision to discontinue the brand. ”

    can you please elaborate this?

    why we take 17 as fair value?

    why they consider fv of 17 instead of 20?

    June 10, 2020 at 8:17 pm #573414
    f6ali
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 342
    • ☆☆☆

    @misbahkiran said:
    why they consider fv of 17 instead of 20?

    I neither have question nor answer to the question for reference. If you can type at least the question, it would help in understanding the context.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mm3677 on IAS 16 Accounting for a revaluation – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • Anastesia123 on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 26 Questions Variance Analysis
  • acowtant on Changes in group structure – examples – ACCA SBR lectures
  • Samantha96 on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part a) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in