- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
.
- Posts
Q4(a)vidence expected to be on file:
1. 3rd point: The corroborating documentation refers to source document?Q4(b)Evidence expected to be on file:
2. 6th point: typo? Branch or brand? if not,then the brand refers to brand name?3. LAST 3RD POINT: what is the brand refers to here?acquired brand name?the question did not mention any acquired brand name? I didn’t understand this part ” This is specifically relevant to any acquired brands which may be sold through the retail stores or any retail brands acquired by Osier Co”
1. To corroborate is to support/provide evidence of something – so it could easily be a source document
2. Surely you can decide in context whether something is a typo. If ACCA’s published answer typos are unlikely though not impossible – if reproduced in a kit then typos more likely. Yes ther term brand generally refers to the brand name.
3. If not clear from question then I would consider it to be speculation – so ignore.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.