• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

MA[labour efficiency variance]

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › MA[labour efficiency variance]

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 19, 2021 at 10:18 am #610940
    ABA375
    Participant
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Hello, Sir!
    Could you explaing how they get 90% step by step, please?
    The answer which is given by BPP writers isn’t so clear.

    What does 90% mean in the labour efficiency variance answer of this question?

    Question
    XYZ Co is planning to make 120,000 units per period of a new product. The following standards have been set.
    Per unit
    Direct material A 1.2 kg at $11 per kg
    Direct material B 4.7 kg at $6 per kg
    Direct labour:
    Operation 1 42 minutes
    Operation 2 37 minutes
    Operation 3 11 minutes

    Overheads are absorbed at the rate of $30 per labour hour. All direct operatives are paid at the rate of $8 per hour. Attainable work hours are less than clock hours, so the 500 direct operatives have been budgeted for 400 hours each in the period.
    Actual results for the period were:
    Production 126,000 units
    Direct labour cost $1.7m for 215,000 clock hours
    Material A cost $1.65m for 150,000 kg
    Material B cost $3.6m for 590,000 kg

    Answer
    Labour efficiency variance
    126,000 units should take (x 1.5 hrs) 189,000 hrs
    but did take (215,000 hrs x 90%) 193,500 hrs
    4,500 hrs (A)
    Standard rate per hour x $8
    $36,000 (A)

    February 19, 2021 at 4:02 pm #610956
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54665
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The budgeted time per unit is (42 + 37 + 11) / 60 = 1.5 hours.

    They budgeted on working 120,000 x 1.5 = 180,000
    The budgeted on paying (i.e. clock hours) 500 x 400 = 200,000
    They were therefore budgeting on there being 20 hours of idle time, which is 20,000/200,000 = 10% of the hours paid, so 90% of the time is worked.

    Given that they actually paid for 215,000 hours, they will have expected to work for 90% x 215,000 = 193,500 hours.

    I am guessing that you found this in the Study Text rather than in the Revision Kit, because I would be amazed if this were to be asked in the exam 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • Ark1 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • zsotuminu on The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Kim Smith on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Kim Smith on AA Chapter 17 Questions

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in