• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Makonis December 2013

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Makonis December 2013

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 13, 2016 at 4:25 pm #300323
    Robert
    Member
    • Topics: 58
    • Replies: 175
    • ☆☆☆

    John,
    This question involved an acquisition where the acquirer was going to acquire a target for share exchange + cash which represents a 30% premium.
    The question asked to calculate the additional equity value created by combining the 2 company’s.
    My question is when working out the combined value of the company why is the cash payment by the acquirer not included in the cash flow table? I thought this would be included at time 0? Cash payment is 624m

    Many thanks for your on going help

    February 13, 2016 at 6:26 pm #300331
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54671
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Let me try and explain in two ways 🙂

    Most importantly, we are valuing the film based on the future expected free cash flows. Obviously paying out cash now might affect the future cash flows (even if only because there is less cash to earn interest) but we assume any effect like this has been taken account of in the information we are given.

    The other way of looking at it is that although the assets of the acquirer are indeed reduced because of the cash paid out, at the same time the assets of the acquirer are increased because of the investment they have in the company being acquired.

    I hope one or both of the above make sense for you 🙂

    February 15, 2016 at 8:21 am #300484
    Robert
    Member
    • Topics: 58
    • Replies: 175
    • ☆☆☆

    Thanks John, it makes sense now. I guess another way to think of it is that when the acquisition involves borrowing you deduct the borrowing so it’s safe to assume that you don’t deduct the cash payment when there is no borrowing
    Thanks

    February 15, 2016 at 2:37 pm #300576
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54671
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hana1992 on Foreign exchange risk management (2) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ISABIRYEZA on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ISABIRYEZA on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • huunghia18499 on Foreign currency- Functional currency – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in