- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I have been looking at most of the comments by people that passed the March 2017 P4 exam and most of them attribute their success to the link theory. Would someone be kind enough to share this concept. Thanks.
If you read the march 2017 countdown to results forum you’ll see it’s written in details there .
It’s not a secret recipe it’s just a link which suggested that finalists passed or not ( this is just a vague explanation) .
Best to read that forum for details .I myself was curious and checked the link for my results too , as I did pass in the end I felt that this link theory was maybe a glitch in the acca system which helped anticipate the results before hand (weather affiliate or not )
You will see there were people for whom this theory didn’t work as well . So to be honest I can’t conclude anything but solely based on my opinion I would just say it’s a ” theory ” after all and it can be a mere coincidence that I passed .
So I don’t know , you be your own judge . Have a look read the comment from that forum and decide . 🙂
Hope this helps
- The topic ‘Link theory’ is closed to new replies.