• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Limni Co (Jun 13) – additional taxation rate (why 6% and not 7.5%)?

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › Limni Co (Jun 13) – additional taxation rate (why 6% and not 7.5%)?

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 8, 2016 at 8:29 am #320718
    malcolmtucker
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Limni Co says that $15 million in dividends was received from overseas subsidiaries on which 20% tax was already paid. 26% is the rate in Limni’s jurisdiction with credit given for tax already paid.

    Wouldn’t this mean that $15 million is 80% of the amount on which the tax was levied, so the dividends actually paid was $15/08 million = $18.75 million? 26% of this amount would be $4.875 m. The tax already paid on it was $18.75 m – $15 m = $3.75 m. Thus, it seems to me that the tax still due in Limni’s jurisdiction would be $4.875 m – $3.75 m = $1.125 m. Or to put it simply, the tax still due from the $15 million is 0.06/0.8 = 0.075 or 7.5%.

    If the tax in Limni’s jurisdiction is charged on the amount actually received i.e. $15 m, then the tax due would be 26% of $15 m = $3.9 million and the tax already paid would still be $15 m x 0.2/0.8 = $3.75 million, so the tax still due would be $3.9 m – $3.75 m = $0.15 m i.e. 26% – 0.2/0/8 = 1%.

    I don’t understand why in the examiner’s answer the additional tax is the difference in tax rates applied to the after-tax amount from the subsidiary i.e. 6% of $15 m, which is $0.9 m.

    June 8, 2016 at 9:26 am #320749
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I will answer you, but in future you must ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum if you want me to answer – this forum is for students to help each other.

    What you have written is very valid and would certainly have got the marks (albeit there will only have been 1 mark for this figure).

    (There is rarely just one right answer in P4 – so much depends on assumptions – but the markers for P4 are very good.)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 17 – The nature of communication – Questions
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 14 – How people learn – Questions
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in