• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Limni Co (Jun 13) – additional taxation rate (why 6% and not 7.5%)?

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › Limni Co (Jun 13) – additional taxation rate (why 6% and not 7.5%)?

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 8, 2016 at 8:29 am #320718
    malcolmtucker
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Limni Co says that $15 million in dividends was received from overseas subsidiaries on which 20% tax was already paid. 26% is the rate in Limni’s jurisdiction with credit given for tax already paid.

    Wouldn’t this mean that $15 million is 80% of the amount on which the tax was levied, so the dividends actually paid was $15/08 million = $18.75 million? 26% of this amount would be $4.875 m. The tax already paid on it was $18.75 m – $15 m = $3.75 m. Thus, it seems to me that the tax still due in Limni’s jurisdiction would be $4.875 m – $3.75 m = $1.125 m. Or to put it simply, the tax still due from the $15 million is 0.06/0.8 = 0.075 or 7.5%.

    If the tax in Limni’s jurisdiction is charged on the amount actually received i.e. $15 m, then the tax due would be 26% of $15 m = $3.9 million and the tax already paid would still be $15 m x 0.2/0.8 = $3.75 million, so the tax still due would be $3.9 m – $3.75 m = $0.15 m i.e. 26% – 0.2/0/8 = 1%.

    I don’t understand why in the examiner’s answer the additional tax is the difference in tax rates applied to the after-tax amount from the subsidiary i.e. 6% of $15 m, which is $0.9 m.

    June 8, 2016 at 9:26 am #320749
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I will answer you, but in future you must ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum if you want me to answer – this forum is for students to help each other.

    What you have written is very valid and would certainly have got the marks (albeit there will only have been 1 mark for this figure).

    (There is rarely just one right answer in P4 – so much depends on assumptions – but the markers for P4 are very good.)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • EricObi on IAS 37 – Best estimate – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in