- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
.
- Posts
Dear Sir
development will take 3 years FOLLOWING which the machinery will have a market life of 3 years
This indicates to me 15years – 3. Answer is showing 12-3It is confusing as the word following indicates to me 12 more years, not 9 more
Please clarify
regards
The question actually says that development will take 3 years following which it will have a market life of 12 years.
The answer does not take 12 – 3 at all.
You either take the 15 year annuity factor less the 3 year annuity factor
or
You take the 12 year annuity factor and multiply by the ordinary 3 year present value factor (because the annuity starts 3 years late – at time 4 instead of time 1).Both approaches give the same answer (apart from rounding, which is irrelevant), and I explain them in my lectures.
The BPP answer has taken the second approach.
I meant to say 12 years, not 3 in sentence 1. it was 4;30 am
the answer takes 1-12 and then still deducts 3
Dear Sir
I think I have it now…sometimes you have to sit and do nothing for a few hours….Am i correct in assuming that the developmental cost to get to the stage of being able to spend more must be less than the call option? The actual value of the developmental cost has nothing to do with the present value of the inflows and the cost in 3 years to do whatever you are going to do is not subject to any discounting or inflation as that is all somehow in the formula somewhere??????
Regards
If you are referring to the calculation of PV of 36.79, then the answer certainly does not take 1 to 12 and deduct anything.
The answer does exactly what I have written in my previous post.
Dear Sir
You are right, of course you are right..i mean i worked it out.. that method of the 12 year annuity factor by the 3 year pv is very nifty and the rest of my assumptions are therefore correct??
- The topic ‘Lignum BPP 69’ is closed to new replies.