• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Liability of Partnership

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Liability of Partnership

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by AvatarMikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 16, 2017 at 8:53 am #416058
    Avatarsecondstar
    Member
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 220
    • ☆☆☆

    Greetings Sir,
    Hope you’re doing good.
    Came across this point while studying partnership and i’m a bit confused. Please tell me if i’ve got it right or not.

    Firm (ordinary partnership) is NOT liable for the debts arising from a contract if:
    1. 3rd party does not know that the individual partner has no actual authority
    2. Individual partner has no actual authority and 3rd party knows or has reason to believe that he has no actual authority.

    In both cases, it is similar that individual partner has no actual authority. Now whether the 3rd party knows or not, it will still be a liability for the individual partner and not the firm. I’m confused while as in BPP Study Text, it is written that if the 3rd party does not know that he had no authority, then the firm is liable.

    Kindly explain which one is right.
    Thanks in advance.

    November 16, 2017 at 9:17 am #416072
    AvatarMikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23368
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If he DOESN’T know that the partner’s authority was restricted, then the firm is liable

    If he DOES know that the partner’s authority is restricted, only the individual partner is liable, and not the firm

    Is that better?

    BPP seems to have chosen an awkward way to express the matter!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Liability of Partnership’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in