• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

laceto 6/01

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › laceto 6/01

  • This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 18, 2015 at 2:14 pm #241710
    student07
    Member
    • Topics: 193
    • Replies: 162
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir its really confusing for calculating wacc cost of equity is based on Omnigen’s and cost of debt is based on Laceto why.

    April 18, 2015 at 2:59 pm #241717
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Laceto is acquiring Omnigen.

    The discount rate to use whenever a company is investing (whether investing in a project, or, as here, investing in buying another company) is determined by the riskiness of the specific project, and the gearing used in financing the project.

    The riskiness of Omnigen is determined by Omnigens beta (which might be higher or lower than Laceto’s current beta, but that is not relevant). The gearing relevant is Laceto’s borrowing (because it is Laceto that is doing the investing).

    April 18, 2015 at 8:16 pm #241761
    student07
    Member
    • Topics: 193
    • Replies: 162
    • ☆☆☆

    Thank you sir.

    April 19, 2015 at 12:21 pm #241810
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

    May 4, 2015 at 3:04 am #243909
    ranei
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Hi Sir, for this same question Laceto, why is it that 19 is being used when finding the growth instead of 32. I calculated $256 and $299 with a 3% and 5% growth respectively while BPP has $186 and $212.

    May 4, 2015 at 6:42 am #243928
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    To get the value of the flows from time 6 onwards we use the dividend growth formula, and you can certainly use 32.
    However, that formula would give a PV (time 0) if the flows started at time 1. In fact they start at time 6 which is 5 years later.
    So using 32 in the formula gives a PV at time 5. So we then need to discount that answer by 5 years.
    (Which comes to the same answer as what BPP have done – discount for 5 years first (19) and then use the formula)

    November 23, 2015 at 6:32 am #284659
    ogohuldar
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 47
    • ☆☆

    Sir,

    I’m also finding it difficult to figure out why 19 (discounted value)is being used when calculating for terminal value of Omnigen instead of 32 (free cash flow value).

    In another similar question- Intergrand (SFM 12/02), Bpp used 13.2 ( free cash flow value) NOT 9.3 (present value) to determine the terminal value.

    My question is, how do I know when to use PV and when to use free cash flow value?

    Thank you.

    November 23, 2015 at 7:51 am #284678
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    BPP have made a mistake in the Laceto question.
    They should have used 32 and not 19, and their answer is wrong.

    (You either use 32 and then discount the answer for 4 years (multiplying by 0.592), or alternatively you use 19 and then you don’t need to discount the answer because it is already discounted – both ways would give the same answer. BPP has got muddled and got it wrong 🙂 )

    November 28, 2015 at 6:07 pm #286001
    ogohuldar
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 47
    • ☆☆

    Thank you very much for that clarification.

    November 29, 2015 at 7:33 am #286056
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • EricObi on IAS 37 – Best estimate – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in