Skip to content

Ask the Tutor ACCA PM

kit FURNIVAL

KKkk7y ago
FURNIVAL Furnival has a distillation plant that produces three joint products, P, Q and R, in the proportions 10:5:5. After the split?off point the products can be sold for industrial use or they can be taken to the mixing plant for blending and refining. The latter procedure is normally followed. For a typical week, in which all the output is processed in the mixing plant, the following income statement can be prepared: Product P Product Q Product R Sales volume (gallons) 1,000 500 500 Price per gallon ($) 12.50 20 10 Sales revenue ($) 12,500 10,000 5,000 –––––– –––––– –––––– Joint process cost ($) (apportioned using output volume) 5,000 2,500 2,500 Mixing plant cost ($): Process costs 3,000 3,000 3,000 Other separable costs 2,000 500 500 –––––– –––––– –––––– Total costs ($) 10,000 6,000 6,000 –––––– –––––– –––––– Profit/(loss) ($) 2,500 4,000 (1,000) –––––– –––––– –––––– The joint process costs are 25% fixed and 75% variable, whereas the mixing plant costs are 10% fixed and 90% variable and all the ‘other separable costs’ are variable. If the products had been sold at the split?off point the selling price per gallon would have been: Product P Product Q Product R $5.00 $6.00 $1.50 There are only 45 hours available per week in the mixing plant. Typically 30 hours are taken up with the processing of Product P, Q and R (10 hours for each product line) and 15 hours are used for other work that generates (on average) a profit of $200 per hour after being charged with a proportionate share of the plant’s costs (including fixed costs). The manager of the mixing plant considers that he could sell all the plant’s processing time externally at a price that would provide this rate of profit. It has been suggested: (i) that, since Product R regularly makes a loss, it should be sold off at the split?off point (ii) that it might be possible advantageously to change the mix of products achieved in the distillation plant. It is possible to change the output proportions to 7:8:5 at a cost of $1 for each additional gallon of Q produced by the distillation plant. Required: Compare the costs and benefits for each of the above proposals. Recommend, for each proposal, whether it should or should not be implementented sir in above the question i think we need to include fixed cost as cost if we need to get a profit of 200/hr, but in question not told the fixed cost absorbed on the basis of labour hour and why we include it on this basis
John MoffatJohn MoffatTutor7y ago#1
You have not said in which 'kit' you have found this question. I only have the BPP Revision Kit and it is not there, and so I assume it must be the Kaplan Kit and I am therefore not able to help you. However, you must not type out full questions like this here - they are copyright and it is illegal (and against ACCA regulations) to type out copyright material. (This question could obviously not appear (as you have typed it) in Paper PM given the current format of the exam. In fact joint cost question are unlikely to appear anywhere in the PM exam given that they are examined in Paper MA (was Paper F2).)
Topic lockedNew replies are closed.