Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › Kaplan Kit Qn on CSOFP- Highmoor
- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by apau.
- AuthorPosts
- April 13, 2011 at 9:23 am #48081
Hi.
I have a doubt regarding Negative goodwill/ bargain purchase. Why do we add it to the Retained Earnings?April 13, 2011 at 9:50 am #80815hi there i would like to solve that questions as well, though i dont have Kaplan kit. if you have pdf version can you please share it . or just type the question and all of us will do it. will benefit you and us !
if you are willing to send pdf my id is batoolhudda@hotmail.comApril 13, 2011 at 10:22 am #80816AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- ☆
Hi as far as I know if goodwill is positive we capitalise as tangible and test for impairment but if negative we credit to income statement
April 13, 2011 at 11:21 am #80817@rajshree said:
Hi as far as I know if goodwill is positive we capitalise as tangible and test for impairment but if negative we credit to income statementThat’s right. But in the answer, they are adding the amount to retained earnings. Im trying to relate this to the ‘cr. in Income statement’, and I think we gotta treat bargain purchase as ‘income’. So that goes on cr side of I/S and I guess that’s why we add it to retained earnings. Not sure about this.
April 13, 2011 at 11:24 am #80818Here’s the link to the question. It’s name is Highmoor. Try solving it.
https://opentuition.com/groups/f7-financial-reporting/documents/May 3, 2011 at 3:28 pm #80819First – if it’s positive goodwill, it should be capitalised as an INTANGIBLE asset and tested annually for impairment
Second, if it’s negative goodwill, it should be credited to retained earnings ( after reassessing at the year end the fair values at date of acquisition ) in the next set of financial statements after acquisition. By crediting it to retained earnings, this will INCREASE retained earnings – it’s like a “profit” made on acquisition
May 4, 2011 at 11:09 am #80822‘It’s like a profit made on acquisition’. That’s what I was looking for. Thank you! 🙂
May 4, 2011 at 11:57 am #80823Tthank you Mike little
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.