Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Kaplan Exam kit Question 58 b(ii) on Collar Hedge
- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- April 30, 2015 at 3:41 pm #243391
Hi Mike,
How did they come to the maximum internet rate of 4.75%?
Thanks
April 30, 2015 at 4:31 pm #243396Mike does not teach P4 🙂
Please give the name of the question (and if it is a past exam question then which date). It seems that my edition of the Kaplan kit is different from yours.
April 30, 2015 at 5:26 pm #243410Oops.. Sorry John,
The name of the question is Collar Hedge in Kaplan(June 03 A). BPP has the same question under the name of Troder – Q.51 and it is part b(ii) that I am after.
April 30, 2015 at 6:34 pm #243426🙂
The exercise price of 95250 (although they quote it this way often in the exam, it really means 95.250) is equivalent to a LIBOR rate of 100 – 95.250 = 4.75%
(The free lecture on options might be of help, and the extra note I have written on collars.)
May 1, 2015 at 1:58 pm #243514Hi John,
Thank you for the response. I understand the 100-95.250, but i thought an investor would buy a call option at a floor rate and would sell put at a cap rate.
Now my question is, if an investor would buy call at a floor rate and sell put at a cap rate, why as per the answer on the book we are setting the collar at a same put and call price?
Also, the part b(i) on the same question we find different alternatives to give us a minimum interest rate of 4.05% on the investment. Why haven’t we included a same call and put strike rate on part b(i) to give us more alternatives to choose from?
I hope i am making sense??
May 1, 2015 at 6:30 pm #243557Sorry – but all you asked before was how they came to a maximum of 4.75%, which is what I answered 🙂
Someone depositing (as in this question) will indeed buy a call option in order to set a minimum rate. If they wish to reduce the net premium payable, then they will create a collar by selling a put option and therefore fix a maximum rate.
BPP could have considered more alternatives, but this was not required in the question. The question asked to illustrate how a collar hedge could be used (and they have done this). It then asked what the maximum interest was for the hedge that you had selected.
It did not ask you consider all possibilities and advise as to which was best.
May 1, 2015 at 6:50 pm #243568Thank John, but why have they used the same call and put price to give us 4.75% when clearly, the call option price needs to be higher to that of put option?
May 1, 2015 at 7:12 pm #243574Why does it need to be higher????
If the put and call are at the same price then it effectively fixes the rate, which is fine.
However, I don’t see in the answer that that is the case. They have simply stated the maximum which is what the question required.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.