Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Kaplan Exam Kit
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- January 6, 2023 at 9:42 pm #675450
Hi there, I am confused with 2 questions that give contradictory answers, not sure if Im missing something
Kaplan Exam Kit Q150
‘Which TWO of the following are reasons for dismissal which would be justified as fair?’A) Capability/Qualification of employee
B) Legal Prohibitions of employee
C) Refusal to join trade union
D) Taking part in unofficial industrial action.
The answer is given as A and B. The question below is in the same book as specimen exam questions
In the context of employment law, which of the following is an automatically fair ground for dismissing an employee, the answer is unofficial industrial action, and legal prohibitions was one of the options. Am I missing something?
Thanks
January 7, 2023 at 8:10 am #675460This is from a Government website:
Dismissal for industrial action
You can’t be dismissed for industrial action if:it’s called as a result of a properly organised ballot
it’s about a trade dispute between workers and their employer (eg about your terms and conditions)
a detailed notice about the industrial action (which is legally required) has been given to the employer at least 7 days before it begins
You can claim unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal if you’re dismissed for taking industrial action at any time within the 12 weeks after the action began.After 12 weeks, you can be dismissed if you take industrial action and your employer has tried to settle the dispute. For example, your employer may bring in advisers from Acas to help find a solution.
Capability / qualification loss is certainly a fair ground for dismissal as also is Legal prohibition
Refusal to join a trade union is not a fair ground
BUT!!! participating in strike action is a minefield as briefly identified above
There is a category within the list of dismissals that are deemed unfair and that category, coming after the list of main situations, is ‘Some other substantial reason’
This is a failsafe provision designed to catch other situations that may be thought of as unfair but which don’t fall nicely into any of the established reasons
I can’t explain the Kaplan apparent inconsistency, sorry 🙁
Are you 100% certain that you have not misread the question?
Is this helpful?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.