• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Kaplan Chapter 3

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Kaplan Chapter 3

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 22, 2012 at 1:14 pm #55618
    lou1
    Member
    • Topics: 32
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆☆

    Hello,

    Does anyone have the above book who could explain the final example on linear programming for me (Pg 100 part C). In part B it says it’s advisable to pay overtime to relax the constraints but in part C it mentions not relaxing the constraints – what does this mean and why in part B would it make 2.00 extra contribution but in part C the unit contribution is a loss?

    Many Thanks

    November 22, 2012 at 6:22 pm #108387
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54701
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    In part (a) labour is limited and this limits the number of units that can be produced.

    If we get more labour (which is what relaxing the constraint means) then we can make more units and get more contribution. It is worth getting more labour (by paying overtime) if the extra contribution we get (by making more units) makes it worthwhile.

    In part (c) it says that we cannot relax the constraints, which means that labour is still limited as it was in part (a). So we cannot make more units, and if we make the new product it limits what we can make of the others. It turns out that this would lose us money.

    November 23, 2012 at 8:49 am #108388
    lou1
    Member
    • Topics: 32
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆☆

    Many Thanks – sois is possible that we could get the labour and materials cheaper than the shadow price, dowe just have to assume that in the new P&L we just use the cost plus the shadow price but in reality the cost of labour and material and could be higher than the cost plus the shadow price?

    Also what does the final statement mean – “Incorporating the contribution lost elsewhere by reallocating the scarce resources”?

    November 25, 2012 at 8:25 am #108389
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54701
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There is no point comparing the actual price with the shadow price.
    The shadow price is the most EXTRA that you would be prepared to pay for one extra unit of a limited resource.

    So, for example, suppose materials cost $10 per kg, but the supply was limited and you were using it all. The supplier offers you more, but will charge more for it. Well if the shadow price was $2 then it means that you would be prepared to pay up to $12 per kg for extra supplies.

    I don’t have the Kaplan book and so I can’t explain the last statement out of context.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • RashidMh on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hsaini on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • kennedyavege@2023 on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in